darkSpyro - Spyro and Skylanders Forum > Skylanders: Swap Force > October 13th is a bad time to release SSF...
Page 1 of 2 | Last
1 2
October 13th is a bad time to release SSF... [CLOSED]
hardcoreignitor Gold Sparx Gems: 2583
#1 Posted: 19:53:59 05/10/2013 | Topic Creator
It's 1 day after Pokemon X and Y, this will affect therir sales.
---
nyeheheheheh

hey lois, i’m dustah from mudda 3
LloydDXZX Yellow Sparx Gems: 1637
#2 Posted: 20:39:00 05/10/2013
It's the last day of the weekend!!! smilie
---
Imaginators is making it revive.
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#3 Posted: 20:40:59 05/10/2013
Not really. Pokemon is just a game; Skylanders is a whole action figure series AND a game.

(I know, Pokemon has figures, but most of them are just boring, static figures.)
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
wreckingballbob Emerald Sparx Gems: 4565
#4 Posted: 20:58:00 05/10/2013
And plus, It will still get sales afterwards anyways.
---
5.7.
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#5 Posted: 21:01:19 05/10/2013
Would you rather do it on the following Saturday?
Because I sure dont
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
Sivadreamer Gold Sparx Gems: 2821
#6 Posted: 21:04:18 05/10/2013
October 11th Toys R Us is also releasing some exclusive Disney figures! Expensive weekend for some! Should know by now that 2/3 of video games, music, and movies are released in the last quarter of the year. Last year I'm pretty sure that Pokémon Black/White 2 was released the day or week before Giants too.
---
How many crystals should I buy VS how many will I buy!?
Arc of Archives Yellow Sparx Gems: 1486
#7 Posted: 21:05:46 05/10/2013
You guys underestimate the power of Pokémon.

Not everyone has a lot of money and dedicate it to Skylanders. I know many people who had to pick between the two and are going for Pokémon. It's a behemoth of a series that is the closest to "dominating" handheld gaming.

I'm sure the game will get sales later and it won't really hurt them but might lower their profit since price-lowerings are more common the further you get into a game's lifetime. Guess the figures make up for that though.

Still, at least I'll get to buy a Pokémon game at launch again since I decided to ignore SWAP Force unless I hear something about it that excites me much more than what we've seen. smilie
Edited 2 times - Last edited at 21:08:36 05/10/2013 by Arc of Archives
hardcoreignitor Gold Sparx Gems: 2583
#8 Posted: 21:31:00 05/10/2013 | Topic Creator
Quote: Arc of Archives
You guys underestimate the power of Pokémon.

Not everyone has a lot of money and dedicate it to Skylanders. I know many people who had to pick between the two and are going for Pokémon. It's a behemoth of a series that is the closest to "dominating" handheld gaming.

I'm sure the game will get sales later and it won't really hurt them but might lower their profit since price-lowerings are more common the further you get into a game's lifetime. Guess the figures make up for that though.

Still, at least I'll get to buy a Pokémon game at launch again since I decided to ignore SWAP Force unless I hear something about it that excites me much more than what we've seen. smilie


Thank you! SSF Should have realeased today or tommorow, then they woulda had a bit of a head start and do better finnacially.
---
nyeheheheheh

hey lois, i’m dustah from mudda 3
cbunny84 Yellow Sparx Gems: 1403
#9 Posted: 21:41:25 05/10/2013
It is true. Pokemon sales will probably be as high as skylanders if not more because of its loyal fans and it also being made in a new format. Plus they have bundles as well. Pokemon and skylanders are rivals no matter what anyone on here says. Video games are video games no matter what comes with it or format. I like both and its mad hard to collect both. Everytime you try to catch up on one you fall behind on the other. Whether it was pokemon or gta v, its still a bad date to sell skylanders. I mean, come on. On a Sunday? That's more of a smack than getting it on a Tuesday.
---
new edition: smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie smilie
SkylandersEzra Emerald Sparx Gems: 3714
#10 Posted: 21:55:06 05/10/2013
It's fine by me.

If people want to buy Pokemon instead of SWAP Force that just means there will be more Skylanders for me to buy. I'm okay with this.
GhostRoaster Yellow Sparx Gems: 1803
#11 Posted: 22:02:44 05/10/2013
Wait a minute---a $60 game is a blip compared to the hundreds of dollars required to buy all of these wonderful toys.

You're kidding right, that $60 is to impact Skylanders sales?
---
RIP GhostRoaster. He's reanimated as TakeYourLemons but occasionally is resurrected from the beyond when needed.
Arc of Archives Yellow Sparx Gems: 1486
#12 Posted: 22:11:48 05/10/2013
Not everyone buys all the toys.

I know quite a few people who just buy stuff needed for 100% and one or two favourites. For them, $60 is quite a bit to justify spending on a game. So they ultimately decide to choose one and get the other when it's cheaper.

Grosses-wise Skylanders isn't really under threat, but Pokémon just has more consumer interest. So I think that it will steal some sales from Skylanders if you compare how they'll do- purely at the start.
Quote:
I'm sure the game will get sales later and it won't really hurt them but might lower their profit since price-lowerings are more common the further you get into a game's lifetime. Guess the figures make up for that though.
Tigorus Emerald Sparx Gems: 3589
#13 Posted: 22:17:37 05/10/2013
I know it's affecting my purchasing habits. It's $40 lees that I would be spending on Skylanders...It's Pokemon in 3D.

Oh by the way, there is a Toys R Us 20% off Skylanders Starters that will work with the Frito $10 off starter. Toys R Us can take one manufacturer coupon and one Toys R Us coupon per purchase. I was schooled on this by the associate in video games. So I'm getting my starter for $50 day one. Sorry Gamestop but you're just not competitive enough.
LloydDXZX Yellow Sparx Gems: 1637
#14 Posted: 22:41:49 05/10/2013
I would be better TODAY!!!
---
Imaginators is making it revive.
darkrai848 Emerald Sparx Gems: 3096
#15 Posted: 22:56:46 05/10/2013
For my I don't care I will be buying pokemon x on the 12th but will most likely not even play it till after I beat both wii U and 3DS swap force.
---
If you like toys to life, you might be interested in Lightseekers!
Kickstarter:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/playfusion/lightseekers/description
wideawakewesley Emerald Sparx Gems: 3281
#16 Posted: 23:54:56 05/10/2013
What's Pokemon? smilie
---
Contributor to Family Gamer TV - http://www.familygamer.tv/
Follow me on twitter - http://www.twitter.com/wideawakewesley
TrapShadowFan Emerald Sparx Gems: 3511
#17 Posted: 00:02:08 06/10/2013
Good thing I already have 210 bucks saved for the weekend!
LloydDXZX Yellow Sparx Gems: 1637
#18 Posted: 00:19:36 06/10/2013
Quote: darkrai848
For my I don't care I will be buying pokemon x on the 12th but will most likely not even play it till after I beat both wii U and 3DS swap force.



Good!!! That's a portal master!!!
---
Imaginators is making it revive.
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#19 Posted: 00:30:19 06/10/2013
Quote: TrapShadowFan
Good thing I already have 210 bucks saved for the weekend!



Good thing that I'm loaded with rare figures to sell.. smilie
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
Friendzie Blue Sparx Gems: 611
#20 Posted: 04:18:27 06/10/2013
All that really matters is that they release it before the holiday shopping season. First week sales will be strong either way because of fans like us. What's going to make or break the franchise is the long-term sales of the figures and games. Long-term sales won't be affected by this. I mean, Pokemon was going to come out one way or another. You can't help that.
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#21 Posted: 04:49:54 06/10/2013
Quote: wideawakewesley
What's Pokemon? smilie



Unrelated video game to the site
Basically you capture creatures and make them fight
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
talon4000 Yellow Sparx Gems: 1803
#22 Posted: 04:55:23 06/10/2013
Yeah Pokemon will take some of Skylander's sales, but there isn't a good time to release a game for it to be on sale for the holiday season without competition of some kind.

But since these are the two games I'm most excited for this year, (maybe kinda odd for someone in their mid 20s, but I like what I like) I budgeted my spending money accordingly
flashwingftw Emerald Sparx Gems: 3332
#23 Posted: 04:57:43 06/10/2013
Quote: hardcoreignitor
Quote: Arc of Archives
You guys underestimate the power of Pokémon.

Not everyone has a lot of money and dedicate it to Skylanders. I know many people who had to pick between the two and are going for Pokémon. It's a behemoth of a series that is the closest to "dominating" handheld gaming.

I'm sure the game will get sales later and it won't really hurt them but might lower their profit since price-lowerings are more common the further you get into a game's lifetime. Guess the figures make up for that though.

Still, at least I'll get to buy a Pokémon game at launch again since I decided to ignore SWAP Force unless I hear something about it that excites me much more than what we've seen. smilie


Thank you! SSF Should have realeased today or tommorow, then they woulda had a bit of a head start and do better finnacially.



Amen! I wouldnt mind it coming out a week early! I'm getting both on the 13th anyway so I don't drag my mom out cuz it's hard enough to get her to take me anywhere I want. Anyway, won't be playing it until I finish swap force, skylanders before Pokemon lately, my childhood must be frowning on me.... Oh well.
---
The PinkPrint is on iTunes now! #TeamMinaj
Been here for 3 years and still can't figure out why half of the people are so damn rude.
R.I.P to my wallet
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 04:59:35 06/10/2013 by flashwingftw
diddy50 Gold Sparx Gems: 2554
#24 Posted: 04:58:33 06/10/2013
Quote: wideawakewesley
What's Pokemon? smilie



More competition than Infinity!
LightSpyro13 Blue Sparx Gems: 861
#25 Posted: 05:50:14 06/10/2013
Quote: hardcoreignitor
It's 1 day after Pokemon X and Y, this will affect therir sales.



As popular as Pokémon is (only surpassed by Mario), Skylanders will still do fine even with them around. I'm sure that they will still be good for now, I only see them flopping in like 10 years in the future.

Not in sales, but in Game Critic Reviews.

The only real competition right now they have is Disney Infinity and normal everyday toys, and even then Skylanders will (sadly) remain the top seller. They've already sold 100,000,000 toys....
---
Fins, of fury!
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#26 Posted: 14:43:58 06/10/2013
Quote: flashwingftw
Quote: hardcoreignitor
Quote: Arc of Archives
You guys underestimate the power of Pokémon.

Not everyone has a lot of money and dedicate it to Skylanders. I know many people who had to pick between the two and are going for Pokémon. It's a behemoth of a series that is the closest to "dominating" handheld gaming.

I'm sure the game will get sales later and it won't really hurt them but might lower their profit since price-lowerings are more common the further you get into a game's lifetime. Guess the figures make up for that though.

Still, at least I'll get to buy a Pokémon game at launch again since I decided to ignore SWAP Force unless I hear something about it that excites me much more than what we've seen. smilie


Thank you! SSF Should have realeased today or tommorow, then they woulda had a bit of a head start and do better finnacially.



Amen! I wouldnt mind it coming out a week early! I'm getting both on the 13th anyway so I don't drag my mom out cuz it's hard enough to get her to take me anywhere I want. Anyway, won't be playing it until I finish swap force, skylanders before Pokemon lately, my childhood must be frowning on me.... Oh well.


Sadly I might do the reverse seeing as I am currently without any kind of DS and will more then likely spend at least 2 days playing it (ordered 2ds and getting pokemon X) but I am still going to play a little bit
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
TrapShadowFan Emerald Sparx Gems: 3511
#27 Posted: 17:30:19 06/10/2013
It's kind of good for me because when I get Pokemon y it will give me something to do while waiting for swap force xD
Tigorus Emerald Sparx Gems: 3589
#28 Posted: 17:32:02 06/10/2013
Quote: TrapShadowFan
It's kind of good for me because when I get Pokemon y it will give me something to do while waiting for swap force xD


This times infinity. My brain is already on overload waiting for both of these. Pokemon will save me next weekend while we wait.
flashwingftw Emerald Sparx Gems: 3332
#29 Posted: 17:33:00 06/10/2013
I really think Gen 6 came out too soon, usually there's 4-5 years for one, but Gen 5 was only 3, that's annoying.
---
The PinkPrint is on iTunes now! #TeamMinaj
Been here for 3 years and still can't figure out why half of the people are so damn rude.
R.I.P to my wallet
azz01 Emerald Sparx Gems: 3172
#30 Posted: 17:38:39 06/10/2013
Quote: flashwingftw
I really think Gen 6 came out too soon, usually there's 4-5 years for one, but Gen 5 was only 3, that's annoying.

That's because there was bearly any spin offs like Battle Revolution.
---
Call me the penguin man for that is who I am. Also stan LOOΠΔ!
Avatar by Trix Master
Takadox360 Gold Sparx Gems: 2888
#31 Posted: 17:44:27 06/10/2013
Quote: flashwingftw
I really think Gen 6 came out too soon, usually there's 4-5 years for one, but Gen 5 was only 3, that's annoying.



I think thats why a lot if the new Pokemon look very poor designed.
---
i am trash
Tigorus Emerald Sparx Gems: 3589
#32 Posted: 17:45:09 06/10/2013
Quote: azz01
Quote: flashwingftw
I really think Gen 6 came out too soon, usually there's 4-5 years for one, but Gen 5 was only 3, that's annoying.

That's because there was bearly any spin offs like Battle Revolution.


Plus let's face it, it's time they embraced 3D. When the Pokedex 3D was introduced I thought for sure the sequel to White/Black would be in 3D since they were basically showing us they had them already made up in 3D with battle animations and everything...but alas it was a BIG tease. This needs to happen now for them to stay relevant (I.M.O. don't shoot me). The collectible space is becoming crowded but could stand to get a little more crowded. The Pokemon Rumble figs. are just lazy on Nintendo's part. The could have easily done something closer to Skylanders with nicer random figs sold in the same manner as the Rumble figs but you unlocked them in game. I totally /facepalmed when I saw the Rumble figs and their interaction....Rumble???Really!!!!????!111?????
Arc of Archives Yellow Sparx Gems: 1486
#33 Posted: 19:15:38 06/10/2013
Quote: flashwingftw
I really think Gen 6 came out too soon, usually there's 4-5 years for one, but Gen 5 was only 3, that's annoying.

Actually, Gen II only lasted a few years as well.
ZapNorris Ripto Gems: 5109
#34 Posted: 19:16:44 06/10/2013
no it won't skylanders will kick pokeass!
Rattle Blade Blue Sparx Gems: 803
#35 Posted: 19:41:16 06/10/2013
Sucks that it comes out Sunday for me but the next day is Columbus Day so no school for me! smilie
---
Awesome avatar by AceArchdragon! smilie smilie smilie smilie
Timmy! Bring meh some woofles!
>N<
IceStar Gold Sparx Gems: 2186
#36 Posted: 19:58:41 06/10/2013
Nope, I don't think it's a bad time smilie
bubba Green Sparx Gems: 161
#37 Posted: 20:16:44 06/10/2013
fine with me we get Monday off for thanks giving
---
Who else loves Doom Stone!!!
minecrafter Blue Sparx Gems: 852
#38 Posted: 20:43:47 06/10/2013
yea it sucks. see you at christmas 2013 pokemon Y
flashwingftw Emerald Sparx Gems: 3332
#39 Posted: 20:48:23 06/10/2013
Quote: Rattle Blade
Sucks that it comes out Sunday for me but the next day is Columbus Day so no school for me! smilie



Me too! It's good it's comin out next week (for me at least) anyway, far too busy this weekend plus we don't have this Monday off, Colombia may be an ass for what he did to the native Americans but he can sure pick great times for days off!
---
The PinkPrint is on iTunes now! #TeamMinaj
Been here for 3 years and still can't figure out why half of the people are so damn rude.
R.I.P to my wallet
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#40 Posted: 22:11:11 06/10/2013
Quote: TrapShadowFan
It's kind of good for me because when I get Pokemon y it will give me something to do while waiting for swap force xD



That final day stall method
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
Tributaryink9 Blue Sparx Gems: 762
#41 Posted: 22:49:01 06/10/2013
It doesn't even really matter. Most peoplr, if they're like me, will end up getting both. And fir SSF you don't have to get all the figures now. You can just wait till later to get them.
---
Favorites: smilie smilie smilie smilie
joerox123 Yellow Sparx Gems: 1992
#42 Posted: 23:30:09 06/10/2013
Quote: Matteomax
Not really. Pokemon is just a game; Skylanders is a whole action figure series AND a game.

(I know, Pokemon has figures, but most of them are just boring, static figures.)



Oh god, someone insulted Pokemon, time to bring out the defense.

Pokemon is more than a "game", Pokemon is a powerhouse. How have they managed to stay alive for near 15 Years if it is just a game huh? I expect one more Skylander game then done. Not everyone wants to spend 10.00 on one figure with like 12 Powers and 20 levels, why not get one game for 40.00, but have over 700, each on with 100+ Powers and 100 Levels? And the eight badges you collect,not to mention all the story line and plot. Skylanders is just: Find Kaos, beat him, yay! Nothing aftergame really. Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory. At least Pokemon has replay value. How can one game with like 20 Levels, and rip-offs like Dark Skylanders, compete with pokemon? And the arguement: "oh they have figures, they win" Let's see, they have collectibale cards, plushes, and even figures, and even something like Skylanders. SKylanders did not invent the "game that connects with figures that have chips", no. Pokemon is and always will be better than Skylanders.
---
the road is long, we carry on
try to have fun in the meantime☠
awesomerockets Emerald Sparx Gems: 4149
#43 Posted: 23:35:25 06/10/2013
Quote: joerox123
Quote: Matteomax
Not really. Pokemon is just a game; Skylanders is a whole action figure series AND a game.

(I know, Pokemon has figures, but most of them are just boring, static figures.)



Oh god, someone insulted Pokemon, time to bring out the defense.

Pokemon is more than a "game", Pokemon is a powerhouse. How have they managed to stay alive for near 15 Years if it is just a game huh? I expect one more Skylander game then done. Not everyone wants to spend 10.00 on one figure with like 12 Powers and 20 levels, why not get one game for 40.00, but have over 700, each on with 100+ Powers and 100 Levels? And the eight badges you collect,not to mention all the story line and plot. Skylanders is just: Find Kaos, beat him, yay! Nothing aftergame really. Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory. At least Pokemon has replay value. How can one game with like 20 Levels, and rip-offs like Dark Skylanders, compete with pokemon? And the arguement: "oh they have figures, they win" Let's see, they have collectibale cards, plushes, and even figures, and even something like Skylanders. SKylanders did not invent the "game that connects with figures that have chips", no. Pokemon is and always will be better than Skylanders.



[User Posted Image]

-----------
---
go to my guestbook now and sign a petition to get Freddie benson into smash
Tigorus Emerald Sparx Gems: 3589
#44 Posted: 23:40:06 06/10/2013
YESSSSSS a debate. You know what Joerox, for the most part you are right.....EXCEPT Pokemon being better...I like them equally and it's really a matter of preference. Plus I think Pokemon has been around in the US since 1994 so almost 20 years. Pokemon satisfies an itch that no other game can satisfy. I am happiest when I'm collecting and leveling something. With MMO's I actually like the leveling process...Yeah I'm nuts I know. For me, it feels like I'm connecting to the creature I'm leveling and helping it achieve greatness. Skylanders satisfies that craving somewhat with the figure hunt and leveling but Skylanders all adds beating the ever loving crap out of a bunch of baddies like Diablo, and other hack and slash titles. Both have their place but it's hard to say what's better. I am 100% in agreement thought that Pokemon is not JUST a game...it's an experience.
SlayerX11 Emerald Sparx Gems: 3488
#45 Posted: 00:29:14 07/10/2013
Quote: Sivadreamer
October 11th Toys R Us is also releasing some exclusive Disney figures! Expensive weekend for some! Should know by now that 2/3 of video games, music, and movies are released in the last quarter of the year. Last year I'm pretty sure that Pokémon Black/White 2 was released the day or week before Giants too.



What Disney is coming out the 11th?
LightSpyro13 Blue Sparx Gems: 861
#46 Posted: 01:02:19 07/10/2013
Quote: joerox123
Quote: Matteomax
Not really. Pokemon is just a game; Skylanders is a whole action figure series AND a game.

(I know, Pokemon has figures, but most of them are just boring, static figures.)



Oh god, someone insulted Pokemon, time to bring out the defense.

Pokemon is more than a "game", Pokemon is a powerhouse. How have they managed to stay alive for near 15 Years if it is just a game huh? I expect one more Skylander game then done. Not everyone wants to spend 10.00 on one figure with like 12 Powers and 20 levels, why not get one game for 40.00, but have over 700, each on with 100+ Powers and 100 Levels? And the eight badges you collect,not to mention all the story line and plot. Skylanders is just: Find Kaos, beat him, yay! Nothing aftergame really. Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory. At least Pokemon has replay value. How can one game with like 20 Levels, and rip-offs like Dark Skylanders, compete with pokemon? And the arguement: "oh they have figures, they win" Let's see, they have collectibale cards, plushes, and even figures, and even something like Skylanders. SKylanders did not invent the "game that connects with figures that have chips", no. Pokemon is and always will be better than Skylanders.



I agree that Pokémon is better and Skylanders didn't invent the Toys to Life Idea, but its not that much better.

Quote:
Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory
That's basically ALL Pokémon is, they've been doing the same routine for the last 15 years. The Story and Gameplay remain almost exactly the same for each of their games, with few significant improvements and light changes. Some of the games such as Emerald & Platinum have so little changes that they feel more like upgrades to their sister games rather than actual sequels (imo at least), much like Night Warriors: Darkstalkers' Revenge.

As for the replay value, better than Skylanders, but still a tad disappointing. All you basically unlock is finding older Pokémon in the Wild (not very many of them either), migration of Pokémon from the current game's predecessors, stronger rivals, and Battle Frontier.

So basically, Pokémon is cool and all but it lathers, rinses, and repeats its games too much; much like Mario or Call of Duty games. I wish they would make one game with several changes that are actually significant:

- Brand New Story
- A faster, quicker way of Grinding exp
- Better, Unique Boss Fights
- Something to do with your Pokémon that doesn't involve battling (Like Skylanders Heroic Challenges, it gets old after doing it for the 100th time)
- More Maps and Areas than just one region
- NO MORE EXTRA VERSIONS!!!! Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, Platinum, BW2. If they must upgrade the current games, they should turn them into DLCs or Updates instead of remaking the same Game for another $35 or $40 with a new save file. Technology has now evolved, this stuff is not cool anymore.

I will still play Pokémon through my Life though.
---
Fins, of fury!
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#47 Posted: 01:28:22 07/10/2013
Quote: LightSpyro13
Quote: joerox123
Quote: Matteomax
Not really. Pokemon is just a game; Skylanders is a whole action figure series AND a game.

(I know, Pokemon has figures, but most of them are just boring, static figures.)



Oh god, someone insulted Pokemon, time to bring out the defense.

Pokemon is more than a "game", Pokemon is a powerhouse. How have they managed to stay alive for near 15 Years if it is just a game huh? I expect one more Skylander game then done. Not everyone wants to spend 10.00 on one figure with like 12 Powers and 20 levels, why not get one game for 40.00, but have over 700, each on with 100+ Powers and 100 Levels? And the eight badges you collect,not to mention all the story line and plot. Skylanders is just: Find Kaos, beat him, yay! Nothing aftergame really. Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory. At least Pokemon has replay value. How can one game with like 20 Levels, and rip-offs like Dark Skylanders, compete with pokemon? And the arguement: "oh they have figures, they win" Let's see, they have collectibale cards, plushes, and even figures, and even something like Skylanders. SKylanders did not invent the "game that connects with figures that have chips", no. Pokemon is and always will be better than Skylanders.



I agree that Pokémon is better and Skylanders didn't invent the Toys to Life Idea, but its not that much better.

Quote:
Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory
That's basically ALL Pokémon is, they've been doing the same routine for the last 15 years. The Story and Gameplay remain almost exactly the same for each of their games, with few significant improvements and light changes. Some of the games such as Emerald & Platinum have so little changes that they feel more like upgrades to their sister games rather than actual sequels (imo at least), much like Night Warriors: Darkstalkers' Revenge.

As for the replay value, better than Skylanders, but still a tad disappointing. All you basically unlock is finding older Pokémon in the Wild (not very many of them either), migration of Pokémon from the current game's predecessors, stronger rivals, and Battle Frontier.

So basically, Pokémon is cool and all but it lathers, rinses, and repeats its games too much; much like Mario or Call of Duty games. I wish they would make one game with several changes that are actually significant:

- Brand New Story
- A faster, quicker way of Grinding exp
- Better, Unique Boss Fights
- Something to do with your Pokémon that doesn't involve battling (Like Skylanders Heroic Challenges, it gets old after doing it for the 100th time)
- More Maps and Areas than just one region
- NO MORE EXTRA VERSIONS!!!! Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, Platinum, BW2. If they must upgrade the current games, they should turn them into DLCs or Updates instead of remaking the same Game for another $35 or $40 with a new save file. Technology has now evolved, this stuff is not cool anymore.

I will still play Pokémon through my Life though.


They added mega evolutions which added a new battle. Options

Also exp share now gives to every pokemon in your team if the equipped pokemon battles. Not to mention you gain exp ileven if you catch a pokemon now
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
LightSpyro13 Blue Sparx Gems: 861
#48 Posted: 02:29:37 07/10/2013
Quote: Windumup
Quote: LightSpyro13
Quote: joerox123



Oh god, someone insulted Pokemon, time to bring out the defense.

Pokemon is more than a "game", Pokemon is a powerhouse. How have they managed to stay alive for near 15 Years if it is just a game huh? I expect one more Skylander game then done. Not everyone wants to spend 10.00 on one figure with like 12 Powers and 20 levels, why not get one game for 40.00, but have over 700, each on with 100+ Powers and 100 Levels? And the eight badges you collect,not to mention all the story line and plot. Skylanders is just: Find Kaos, beat him, yay! Nothing aftergame really. Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory. At least Pokemon has replay value. How can one game with like 20 Levels, and rip-offs like Dark Skylanders, compete with pokemon? And the arguement: "oh they have figures, they win" Let's see, they have collectibale cards, plushes, and even figures, and even something like Skylanders. SKylanders did not invent the "game that connects with figures that have chips", no. Pokemon is and always will be better than Skylanders.



I agree that Pokémon is better and Skylanders didn't invent the Toys to Life Idea, but its not that much better.

Quote:
Yet pokemon is: Catch Em all, get all the badges, beat the elite four, play sidequests, defeat afterstory
That's basically ALL Pokémon is, they've been doing the same routine for the last 15 years. The Story and Gameplay remain almost exactly the same for each of their games, with few significant improvements and light changes. Some of the games such as Emerald & Platinum have so little changes that they feel more like upgrades to their sister games rather than actual sequels (imo at least), much like Night Warriors: Darkstalkers' Revenge.

As for the replay value, better than Skylanders, but still a tad disappointing. All you basically unlock is finding older Pokémon in the Wild (not very many of them either), migration of Pokémon from the current game's predecessors, stronger rivals, and Battle Frontier.

So basically, Pokémon is cool and all but it lathers, rinses, and repeats its games too much; much like Mario or Call of Duty games. I wish they would make one game with several changes that are actually significant:

- Brand New Story
- A faster, quicker way of Grinding exp
- Better, Unique Boss Fights
- Something to do with your Pokémon that doesn't involve battling (Like Skylanders Heroic Challenges, it gets old after doing it for the 100th time)
- More Maps and Areas than just one region
- NO MORE EXTRA VERSIONS!!!! Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, Platinum, BW2. If they must upgrade the current games, they should turn them into DLCs or Updates instead of remaking the same Game for another $35 or $40 with a new save file. Technology has now evolved, this stuff is not cool anymore.

I will still play Pokémon through my Life though.


They added mega evolutions which added a new battle. Options

Also exp share now gives to every pokemon in your team if the equipped pokemon battles. Not to mention you gain exp ileven if you catch a pokemon now



I'm well aware of Mega Evolutions. To me, all it seems like is just another evolution of a Pokémon; just requires an item and is only temporary (2 of which are also Version Exclusive). Still not significant enough to revolutionize the franchise.

I didn't know about the Exp All until now, thanks for letting me know. However, the Pokémon that do not participate in Battle only gain half the possible experience and still does not seem fast enough to finish grinding quick. Also not significant enough.

I thought the Horde Battles were a bigger addition than it.
---
Fins, of fury!
Windumup Emerald Sparx Gems: 3217
#49 Posted: 02:43:53 07/10/2013
Quote: LightSpyro13
Quote: Windumup
Quote: LightSpyro13



I agree that Pokémon is better and Skylanders didn't invent the Toys to Life Idea, but its not that much better.

That's basically ALL Pokémon is, they've been doing the same routine for the last 15 years. The Story and Gameplay remain almost exactly the same for each of their games, with few significant improvements and light changes. Some of the games such as Emerald & Platinum have so little changes that they feel more like upgrades to their sister games rather than actual sequels (imo at least), much like Night Warriors: Darkstalkers' Revenge.

As for the replay value, better than Skylanders, but still a tad disappointing. All you basically unlock is finding older Pokémon in the Wild (not very many of them either), migration of Pokémon from the current game's predecessors, stronger rivals, and Battle Frontier.

So basically, Pokémon is cool and all but it lathers, rinses, and repeats its games too much; much like Mario or Call of Duty games. I wish they would make one game with several changes that are actually significant:

- Brand New Story
- A faster, quicker way of Grinding exp
- Better, Unique Boss Fights
- Something to do with your Pokémon that doesn't involve battling (Like Skylanders Heroic Challenges, it gets old after doing it for the 100th time)
- More Maps and Areas than just one region
- NO MORE EXTRA VERSIONS!!!! Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, Platinum, BW2. If they must upgrade the current games, they should turn them into DLCs or Updates instead of remaking the same Game for another $35 or $40 with a new save file. Technology has now evolved, this stuff is not cool anymore.

I will still play Pokémon through my Life though.


They added mega evolutions which added a new battle. Options

Also exp share now gives to every pokemon in your team if the equipped pokemon battles. Not to mention you gain exp ileven if you catch a pokemon now



I'm well aware of Mega Evolutions. To me, all it seems like is just another evolution of a Pokémon; just requires an item and is only temporary (2 of which are also Version Exclusive). Still not significant enough to revolutionize the franchise.

I didn't know about the Exp All until now, thanks for letting me know. However, the Pokémon that do not participate in Battle only gain half the possible experience and still does not seem fast enough to finish grinding quick. Also not significant enough.

I thought the Horde Battles were a bigger addition than it.


Yeah horde battles would be great for exp (Come on give us audino horde encounters)

Also exp all would help those who rely on mostly one pokemon instead of training everyone
---
Ugh I wish my body wasn't a mess
Page 1 of 2 | Last
1 2

Please login or register a forum account to post a message.

Username Password Remember Me