darkSpyro

liek, tottly makin an imbd accnt just to give norm a 10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it's down to 2.9/10 on imdb and 3% on rotten tomatoes

The RT consensus is: "A pioneering feat in the field of twerking polar bear animation but blearily retrograde in every other respect, Norm of the North should only be screened in case of parental emergency."

eeyup

Quote: Sboy13

it's down to 2.9/10 on imdb and 3% on rotten tomatoes

The RT consensus is: "A pioneering feat in the field of twerking polar bear animation but blearily retrograde in every other respect, Norm of the North should only be screened in case of parental emergency."

eeyup

they wouldnt know TRUE film if it bit them in their stupid butts >:C

But nothing isn't that all that should matter in a film?

okay does anyone think of the ****ing cricket from Wall-E when you saw those lemmings?

When I see the lemmings I see very clear attempts at mimicking minions.

Quote: CAV

"a pioneering feat in the field of twerking polar bear animation"

"field of twerking polar bear animation"

"twerking polar bear"

"twerking"

"polar"

"bear"

Sadly i can't watch the movie since it hasen't come out yet in my country. I can't say it's sucks if i haven't seen it.

GOD DAMNIT STOP BRINGING UP THE PAST CROOKSHANKS YOU FIEND

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

please see norm! it might fail at the box office

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/m...mofthenorth.htm

Review that I found.
The most talked about picture of the year, Orson Welles’ production of “Norm of the North,” finally had its New York premiere at the Palace theatre last night, where an eager first night audience enthusiastically applauded the young theatrical man’s latest achievement.

“Norm of the North,” the first picture made by Welles to reach the screen, arrived at the Palace only after a major battle of words and wits had been engaged in by the executives of RKO, who released the film, and Welles, on one side, and the legal advisers of William Randolph Hearst, on the other. The latter evidently imagined that the central character of the picture, one Charles Foster Kane, bore an uncomfortably close resemblance of the great California publisher.

We are not, however, concerned with the controversy, except to say that the portrait of Kane seems more like a composite of a dozen or more American tycoons, rather than a faithful representation of an individual. We are interested in the picture, however, as a contribution to the screen and in that respect, it is one of the most interesting and technically superior films that has ever come out of a Hollywood studio. Aside from tendency to revert to the inadequate lighting of sets that distinguished primitive Russian, German and French films, Welles has approached his subject matter in an original manner.

In the first place, he has done away with the long list of credits that clutter up the beginning of a film, and for this, he has earned our heartfelt gratitude. He begins his story with a March-of-Time-like review of Kane’s life, immediately following the publisher’s death in his castle-like home. In their search for a punch ending to the picture, the film men assign one of their reporters to interview Kane’s most intimate friends and business associates. Thus the story is put together on the screen in piecemeal fashion as bits of information are gleaned from various people and light is thrown on the character of the man by his widow, his best friend and lifelong companion, the business manager of his publishing enterprises and the banker who controlled the purse-strings to his fabulous fortune.

http://kisscartoon.me/Cartoon/...ie-CAM?id=68528

WATCH NORM

Never!! I object to watching Norm Of The North

the ending is great, norm slaps his ass at you and the camera pans up to the sky, and then credits roll

i cant wait for the sequels!!

norm is bae! we need some fanfics!

theres only one rule 34 picture so far!