darkSpyro

Quote: kardonis

Quote: shroom boom

this game series is dead, admit guys it was a fun ride while it lasted. We arent gonna get a 4th game and you have to accept that. just close this thread already its dead.

You have absolutely no idea do you?

If the series is "dead" then explain the thousands of people still talking about it, making fan art, music, and speculation on the story. Oh, and having a movie in production definitely means the series is dead.... V.V

this^

Quote: DummyZ

Quote: kardonis

Quote: shroom boom

this game series is dead, admit guys it was a fun ride while it lasted. We arent gonna get a 4th game and you have to accept that. just close this thread already its dead.

You have absolutely no idea do you?

If the series is "dead" then explain the thousands of people still talking about it, making fan art, music, and speculation on the story. Oh, and having a movie in production definitely means the series is dead.... V.V

this^

ii mean scott isnt making any more games and the fnaf movie will be a ****t pg 13 kids movie that will fail.

Quote: shroom boom

Quote: DummyZ

Quote: kardonis

You have absolutely no idea do you?

If the series is "dead" then explain the thousands of people still talking about it, making fan art, music, and speculation on the story. Oh, and having a movie in production definitely means the series is dead.... V.V

this^

ii mean scott isnt making any more games and the fnaf movie will be a ****t pg 13 kids movie that will fail.

I too can predict what a movie will be like.

It is true though that it doesn't mean Scott is making more FNAFs.

I would like to see your evidence to support these claims, shroom boom.

Scott is playing around with his website, which is evidence enough that he isn't finished with us yet.

As for the movie, I'm hoping that Scott's personal involvement will stop it from being terrible. And who says that it being rated PG-13 means anything? Look at Hunger Games, it was one of the most violent books I ever read, and it's movie version might tone it down a lot, but people are still getting shot, impaled, eaten alive, and graphic flesh wounds inflicted by bees (not even kidding you). The point is, that if something like Hunger Games not only gets away with making a movie that is "indirectly gorey" and that is still loved by many, then why can't fnaf?

Seems like a good theory. :-) keeping in mind that it's only part 1.

Quote: Hot Dog 542

Seems like a good theory. :-) keeping in mind that it's only part 1.

OMG!!!! FINALLY!

Quote: WilltheWizard

Quote: Hot Dog 542

Seems like a good theory. :-) keeping in mind that it's only part 1.

OMG!!!! FINALLY!

^This^

Ehhhhhh, I don't see why there are suddenly 11 dead kids.... IMO the minigames in FNaF3 make it clear there are only six killed. Marionette, Foxy, Freddy, Bonnie, Chica and Golden Freddy. Personally I think that the two shadow animatronics, or as I call them, the purple animatronics, aren't actually the ghosts of the two dead employees, but incarnations of purple guy wearing the suit.

But the idea that the Marionette put the bodies in the suits makes a lot of sense.

Quote: kardonis

Ehhhhhh, I don't see why there are suddenly 11 dead kids.... IMO the minigames in FNaF3 make it clear there are only six killed. Marionette, Foxy, Freddy, Bonnie, Chica and Golden Freddy. Personally I think that the two shadow animatronics, or as I call them, the purple animatronics, aren't actually the ghosts of the two dead employees, but incarnations of purple guy wearing the suit.

But the idea that the Marionette put the bodies in the suits makes a lot of sense.

Mybe that's how the old ones come active in fnaf 2 cause puppet/marionette awoke them with the kids souls

As you can see spring trap has white dots in his pupils mybe that's another sigh of puppet controlling him and purple guy.

Guys, go to scottgames quick!

HOLY CHRIST

FNAF4 CONFIRMED

HE IS NOT KIDDING

Also love how it will be released next Halloween

He must be holding the Freddy hat that used to be on his site.

"The final chapter". And Scott is finally take his time in developing it. October 31st.

I brightened up the image, and it says something along the bottom. I can't quite read it that well, but I saw the word 'fright'???

OH MY GOD. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Better image.

If you brighten it, it says "NIGHTMARE" at the bottom. I'm thinking that might be it's name.

Do you think this is still springtrap, or golden freddy? I noticed some differences like spiked teeth, while springtrap has square teeth. The ear is hard to tell as it gets cut off, and he's holding Freddy's hat.

EDIT: it could be a mash of animatronics. Look at the mouth by the arm, it looks like it has a head on it.

Quote: Hot Dog 542

Do you think this is still springtrap, or golden freddy? I noticed some differences like spiked teeth, while springtrap has square teeth. The ear is hard to tell as it gets cut off, and he's holding Freddy's hat.

Could it be Bonnie?

my question is

what's with all the heads on the body

This is exciting..

Quote: shroom boom

Quote: DummyZ

Quote: kardonis

You have absolutely no idea do you?

If the series is "dead" then explain the thousands of people still talking about it, making fan art, music, and speculation on the story. Oh, and having a movie in production definitely means the series is dead.... V.V

this^

ii mean scott isnt making any more games and the fnaf movie will be a ****t pg 13 kids movie that will fail.

Lol, look who turned against his favorite series real quick, 0-100.

OH GOD NO. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE FNAF AND IF THERE ARE ANY MORE AFTER THIS, GOD KNOWS THAT PEOPLE WILL FALL IN LOVE WITH ****TY GAMES FOREVER.

Quote: TacoMakerSkys

OH GOD NO. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE FNAF AND IF THERE ARE ANY MORE AFTER THIS, GOD KNOWS THAT PEOPLE WILL FALL IN LOVE WITH ****TY GAMES FOREVER.

It's not just about the gameplay, it's mostly about the world of FNAF, and all the deep lore and story, besides.. All the games are actually pretty good, other than the second one~

Quote: Aura24

"The final chapter". And Scott is finally take his time in developing it. October 31st.

He will probably do something like he did when FNAF 2 came out...../

Quote: skylandersspyro

Quote: Aura24

"The final chapter". And Scott is finally take his time in developing it. October 31st.

He will probably do something like he did when FNAF 2 came out...../

wat.

---

I can't even begin to imagine how horrific this THING'S jumpscare is going to be.

Yeah, Scott tends to release his games as soon as demos are release because he tends to be "trigger happy" when it comes to the release of his games.

scott time is valve time reversed.

Quote: Yoshicrashcart8

I can't even begin to imagine how horrific this THING'S jumpscare is going to be.

THIS SO MUCH

Wait a minute, what if it is the fnaf movie?????

Quote: WilltheWizard

Wait a minute, what if it is the fnaf movie?????

Nope... Or highly unlikely, if WB just got the rights to it, it must be the ****iest and most rushed movie ever.. Or they've been secretly been working on it behind our backs the whole time..

wow, a 4th game. i'm honestly kind of mixed about this. on one hand, if Scott takes his time with this one and does wait until Halloween, it could make for the best game in the series. on the other hand, i can't believe Scott is starting to milk this franchise now, even after the series could've just ended perfectly at 3.

Quote: WilltheWizard

Wait a minute, what if it is the fnaf movie?????

not possible. the film isn't even in early, EARLY pre-production yet.

in order for the film to be out by this October, FNaF would've needed to get movie rights the day the first game came out. production for films last about a year when they're rushed, and that's even after they even get a whole team together. and even if a film was made behind our backs there's no way it could possibly be done this quickly. No one was looking to make a movie about this series anyways until after 3 came out.

Quote: MoonHorizons

Better image.

- - -

Im QUITE TORN ABOUT THE 4TH game i mean im happy there is another one but i feel scott is milking the franchise by now. Atleast this is confirmed to be the last fnaf games i had fun completing,beating and playing the first 3 so this one should look good. Oh my god that robot looks hidious whats with the faces on him?!

Wait a minute, did this 'thing' cause the bite of '87?? I'm not jumping to a conclusion or anything, but he has sharp teeth and heads on him who have sharp teeth. But the biggest clue is the 8s and 7s on the tab when you open scottgames.

Quote: Badwolfmichael

Quote: TacoMakerSkys

OH GOD NO. WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE FNAF AND IF THERE ARE ANY MORE AFTER THIS, GOD KNOWS THAT PEOPLE WILL FALL IN LOVE WITH ****TY GAMES FOREVER.

It's not just about the gameplay, it's mostly about the world of FNAF, and all the deep lore and story, besides.. All the games are actually pretty good, other than the second one~

The lore is what's good but when people say "THE GAMEPLAY IS WHATS BETTER AND ITS SO SCARY I CRIED", really pisses me off because they're ignorant and the gameplay is complete **** imo lmao

4 games in one year.

Your move, Ubisoft.

However, on a more serious note...Scott is really milking this series. Its awesome that he's a great businessman, but, dude....you're splitting your fan base. People are going to be so burnt out.

Zero0, Scott started milking the games the moment he revealed FNAF2. He's got the money sickness.

Actually, by the time the 4th releases, it'd be over a year. :3

To all of you who say he's milking the series... I'd wait untill he releases this 4th installment and then, judging by how well he makes it, decide wether he was milking the franchise this whole time or simply had 4 games planned from the beginning.

I'm saying because I personally don't think he is milking the franchise, and the ammount of people saying he is is tiking me.

Quote: DummyZ

To all of you who say he's milking the series... I'd wait untill he releases this 4th installment and then, judging by how well he makes it, decide wether he was milking the franchise this whole time or simply had 4 games planned from the beginning.

I'm saying because I personally don't think he is milking the franchise, and the ammount of people saying he is is tiking me.

I haven't actually played the games myself, but wasn't there some sort of minor cliffhanger in FNaF 3?
Other than the newspaper clipping at the end that had Springtrap in it, I mean.

Quote: DummyZ

To all of you who say he's milking the series... I'd wait untill he releases this 4th installment and then, judging by how well he makes it, decide wether he was milking the franchise this whole time or simply had 4 games planned from the beginning.

I'm saying because I personally don't think he is milking the franchise, and the ammount of people saying he is is tiking me.

Milking isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it is something that that can be defined, and if anything fits the definition of it, it's FNAF.

4 games in a little over a year, with no real technological advancement and no real gameplay enhancements after the second game, and after claiming the third would be the last (and the third game DID wrap things up nicely), is milking. There is no way around that fact.

Scott didn't always have 4 games planned. Scott was a nobody before FNAF came out. Every game he made went under most people's radar, and those who played his games critically panned them. There is no way he had the money for 4 games at that point. No, he made the first game as it's own thing, and when that did so well, he was able to keep going with it and expand the concept.

But like I said, the guy can't really be shot for the money he's making - especially since he did donate money to a hospital in need.

Yikes...

Pinch me, I must be dreaming

Also, a sidenote: could the small heads on the animatronic be the small plush toys you get on your desk in the 2nd game? Possibly a theory...

Quote: sonicbrawler182

Quote: DummyZ

To all of you who say he's milking the series... I'd wait untill he releases this 4th installment and then, judging by how well he makes it, decide wether he was milking the franchise this whole time or simply had 4 games planned from the beginning.

I'm saying because I personally don't think he is milking the franchise, and the ammount of people saying he is is tiking me.

Milking isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it is something that that can be defined, and if anything fits the definition of it, it's FNAF.

4 games in a little over a year, with no real technological advancement and no real gameplay enhancements after the second game, and after claiming the third would be the last (and the third game DID wrap things up nicely), is milking. There is no way around that fact.

Scott didn't always have 4 games planned. Scott was a nobody before FNAF came out. Every game he made went under most people's radar, and those who played his games critically panned them. There is no way he had the money for 4 games at that point. No, he made the first game as it's own thing, and when that did so well, he was able to keep going with it and expand the concept.

But like I said, the guy can't really be shot for the money he's making - especially since he did donate money to a hospital in need.

Yeah Scott seems like a nice guy but im getting burned out with all the games.

is perfectly fine with all of the games

People say its Fred bear and that it takes place in 87 showing the whole story about what happend in the pizzeria it's what I herd but we have to wait and see in 6 months

It could the very first Animatronic, Fredbear/Freddy, from the restaurant pre-1987?