darkSpyro

Call of Duty
And this one is a bit iffy: The Hunger GAmes. I mean, like, Its an awesome trilogy, but I feel like it gets too much attention for what its worth. All of the stories first thirds are snorefests.

Call of Duty
And this one is a bit iffy: The Hunger GAmes. I mean, like, Its an awesome trilogy, but I feel like it gets too much attention for what its worth. All of the stories first thirds are snorefests.

Call of Duty
Por*eaten*
Miley Cyrus

Quote: wreckingballbob

Call of Duty
Por*eaten*
Miley Cyrus

lol a 13 year old hating porn

Any CartoonNetwork show, besides for Ben 10 and Tenkai Knights. Those two are the only ones even relatively close to being good.

SomePerson

Quote: Rickorio

Any CartoonNetwork show, besides for Ben 10 and Tenkai Knights. Those two are the only ones even relatively close to being good.

I'm laughing so much right now.

I don't hate anything. I dislike stuff with a passion though...

Call of Duty - Horrid games. Halo is a much better shooter game series.
Miley Cyrus - I mean, WTF?!?!
Tobuscus - Not. Funny. At. All.
"Ooh, kill 'em!" Again, WTF!?!?
XBOX One - Looks like a crappy VCR. 360 all the way.
All sports, especially football and basketball. (Except dodgeball, kickball, ping pong and swimming.) - Just plain boring..
Justin Beiber - What a jerk. The biggest jerk of all time.
MLP - -4/10 do not recommend. So overrated.

Quote: Big Green

Quote: wreckingballbob

Call of Duty
Por*eaten*
Miley Cyrus

lol a 13 year old hating porn

I am actually 3. It is overrated by people. At least I think.

The Legend of Spyro: Dawn of the Dragon.

Uh, I don't really hate anything. I'm rather indifferent to many of the things listed here because I actively don't indulge them. So I guess I just don't like them. They only thing I can say I hate is today's pop music. SCIENCE has actually proven that these pop songs are blander (and louder) than songs of old. And the lyrics are obnoxious. <.<

Uh, I don't really hate anything. I'm rather indifferent to many of the things listed here because I actively don't indulge them. So I guess I just don't like them. They only thing I can say I hate is today's pop music. SCIENCE has actually proven that these pop songs are blander (and louder) than songs of old. And the lyrics are obnoxious. <.<

Spyro Orange
What do you do with 2 mascots? You make a mini-game collection of course!

Quote: HIR

Uh, I don't really hate anything. I'm rather indifferent to many of the things listed here because I actively don't indulge them. So I guess I just don't like them. They only thing I can say I hate is today's pop music. SCIENCE has actually proven that these pop songs are blander (and louder) than songs of old. And the lyrics are obnoxious. <.<

I beg my pardon for bothering you but where can I find these modern musical studies of modern day music being more boring and bland than the music mankind used to hear? I'm just intrigued. :)

I arrived at college in 1980 (the inception of a decade-long musical graveyard) when many people turned off the radio and instead listened to classic rock and rhythm & blues produced from 1965 to 1978. I notice you like this music as well. Now you can substantiate to today’s generation why that era’s music was objectively “better”.

The Million Song Dataset is a database of western popular music produced from 1955 to 2010. As described in Scientific Reports (affiliated with the publication Scientific American), researchers developed algorithms to see what has changed over time, focusing on three variables: timbre, pitch and loudness. Timbre is a proxy for texture and tone quality, terms which reflect the variety and richness of a given sound. Higher levels of timbre most often result from diverse instrumentation (more than one instrument playing the same note). Pitch refers to the tonal structure of a song: how the chords progress, and the diversity of transitions between chords. Since the 1960’s, timbral variety has been steadily declining, and chord transitions have become narrower and more predictable.



The researchers also found that popular music has gotten a lot louder. The median recorded loudness value of songs by year is shown in the second chart. One illustrative example: in 2008, Metallica fans complained that the Guitar Hero version of its recent album sounded better than it did on CD. As reported in Rolling Stone, the CD version was re-mastered at too high a decibel level, part of the Loudness Wars affecting popular music.

Overall, the researchers concluded that there has been a “progressive homogenization of the musical discourse”, a process which has resulted in music becoming blander and louder. This might seem like a reactionary point of view for an adult to write, but the data does seem to back me up on this. All of that being said, I do like that Method Man-Mary J. Blige duet.

Quote: Project_Unnamed

Quote: HIR

Uh, I don't really hate anything. I'm rather indifferent to many of the things listed here because I actively don't indulge them. So I guess I just don't like them. They only thing I can say I hate is today's pop music. SCIENCE has actually proven that these pop songs are blander (and louder) than songs of old. And the lyrics are obnoxious. <.<

I beg my pardon for bothering you but where can I find these modern musical studies of modern day music being more boring and bland than the music mankind used to hear? I'm just intrigued.

I don't have the link. But here's the article that references the study, excerpted from JP Morgan's "Eye on the Market":

Quote:

I arrived at college in 1980 (the inception of a decade-long musical graveyard) when many people turned off the radio and instead listened to classic rock and rhythm & blues produced from 1965 to 1978. I notice you like this music as well. Now you can substantiate to today’s generation why that era’s music was objectively “better”.

The Million Song Dataset is a database of western popular music produced from 1955 to 2010. As described in Scientific Reports (affiliated with the publication Scientific American), researchers developed algorithms to see what has changed over time, focusing on three variables: timbre, pitch and loudness. Timbre is a proxy for texture and tone quality, terms which reflect the variety and richness of a given sound. Higher levels of timbre most often result from diverse instrumentation (more than one instrument playing the same note). Pitch refers to the tonal structure of a song: how the chords progress, and the diversity of transitions between chords. Since the 1960’s, timbral variety has been steadily declining, and chord transitions have become narrower and more predictable.



The researchers also found that popular music has gotten a lot louder. The median recorded loudness value of songs by year is shown in the second chart. One illustrative example: in 2008, Metallica fans complained that the Guitar Hero version of its recent album sounded better than it did on CD. As reported in Rolling Stone, the CD version was re-mastered at too high a decibel level, part of the Loudness Wars affecting popular music.

Overall, the researchers concluded that there has been a “progressive homogenization of the musical discourse”, a process which has resulted in music becoming blander and louder. This might seem like a reactionary point of view for an adult to write, but the data does seem to back me up on this. All of that being said, I do like that Method Man-Mary J. Blige duet.

Quote: somePerson

Spyro Orange
What do you do with 2 mascots? You make a mini-game collection of course!

Nobody ever complained about Mario And Sonic at the Olympics, and it's a mini game collection of sports with two mascots >.>