darkSpyro

Does anyone think that, y'know, from being on the Wii and all, the graphics might be worse in the Wii version than, say, the PS3?

the wii is AWESOME and the same as itsGraphics graphics!!!!!! I have a ps2 and thw Wii's Graphics is much better!!!!!

Quote: alexis1213

the wii is AWESOME and the same as itsGraphics graphics!!!!!! I have a ps2 and thw Wii's Graphics is much better!!!!!

The diffence there is twice that between the PS3 and XBox 360. The XBox 360 has a bit more than twice that of the Wii.

PS3: 550 MHz, XBox 360: 500 MHz. Wii: cannot find exact number, but unoffical infomation says 243 MHz. PS2: 147 MHz.

LOL lots of math amd PLZ don't have to much math I did the math part of the west test today!!!

But still, the graphics will probably suffer at least a little, even though (I'm pretty sure) Wii's graphics are updatable if the game had awesome graphics. (EX SSB

LOL the graphics r AWESOME I have a wii and I love it so much I play on it all the time!!

I'm guessing that,

• PS3=60GB
  
• Xbox360=20GB
  
• Wii=2GB
  
• PS2=512MB
  
• Xbox=512MB
  
• GC=512MB
  
• PSP=128MB
  
• DS=32MB
  
• PS1=32MB
  
• Advance=512KB
  


• dreamcast=256MB
  

This is what I think, Just for your Information.

Edit: I forgot Xbox and Gamecube.

Wii fanboyism = as bad as thinking that the PSP is a good console.

The Wii IS more powerful than people think... but on another hand, it IS outclassed by the PS3 and Xbox360 graphically.

The question is not "Will the graphics be worse?" but "Will they make good graphics?".

Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros. Brawl show that the Wii CAN do some really nice and neat graphics. All we can hope is that the developers take the hint and stop doing things like those mini-game collection games which have dysmal graphics that are worse than many Gamecube and PS2 titles. Those graphics were okay back when the consoles were less powerful. The Wii can do better than that, give us something that do justice to the console.

All we can do is hope they don't screw up.

and u can also play gamecube games on the wii I do and it's awesome

Well you still have grapics that are 4X better than the PS2 can handle. Besides, PS2 had some really amazing grapics that could compare with the Wii grapics. Think Valcury Profile, Star ocean, and FFXII. Those had some good grapics that is able to compare with 4X the load. Okay?

Graphics on the Wii console will probablly look really cool!

Have you seen the Wii TEN graphics?

I have a wii and the graphics for TEN were awesome!!!!

I know!!! I don't have one but my friend does and we love taking turns and playing it!!!

With DOTD we wont have to because it is 2 PLAYER!!!

iv'e finished it 22 time going on to 23 times

I have finished it once. STUPID FAT ARBORICK KEEPS GETTING IN THE WAY!!!!

once u got him it's easy to get rid of him now it's takes me 3 to 4 minutes to get him slow down time when he gose to punch u and a few seconds before he hots u jump out of the way!

LOL

Quote: Forgotten World

I'm guessing that,

• PS3=60GB
  
• Xbox360=20GB
  
• Wii=2GB
  
• PS2=512MB
  
• Xbox=512MB
  
• GC=512MB
  
• PSP=128MB
  
• DS=32MB
  
• PS1=32MB
  
• Advance=512KB
  


• dreamcast=256MB
  

This is what I think, Just for your Information.

Edit: I forgot Xbox and Gamecube.

That is memory, not how fast it can process the graphic (which I posted earlier) which is more important to the quality. Memory decides the quantity that can be loaded a once (level size).

Once again: PS3: 550 MHz, XBox 360: 500 MHz. Wii: cannot find exact number, but unoffical infomation says 243 MHz. PS2: 147 MHz.

Quote: alexis1213

once u got him it's easy to get rid of him now it's takes me 3 to 4 minutes to get him slow down time when he gose to punch u and a few seconds before he hots u jump out of the way!

LOL

X_X like I said not to much math I did the math part for the west test today X_X

Let's see if the PS4 can get up to 10GHz. he he.

Quote: Denri

Does anyone think that, y'know, from being on the Wii and all, the graphics might be worse in the Wii version than, say, the PS3?

Yep. The Wii focuses on the player movement for gameplay. I mean, "optical disc"? I never heard of that before the Wii came out.

Quote: Forgotten World

I'm guessing that,

• PS3=60GB
  
• Xbox360=20GB
  
• Wii=2GB
  
• PS2=512MB
  
• Xbox=512MB
  
• GC=512MB
  
• PSP=128MB
  
• DS=32MB
  
• PS1=32MB
  
• Advance=512KB
  


• dreamcast=256MB
  

This is what I think, Just for your Information.

Edit: I forgot Xbox and Gamecube.

Actually, the discs hold...

(PS1) CD-ROM disc: 900MB at the most? (Not sure, CD-ROM can mean a number of things)

(Dreamcast) GD-ROM: 1.2GB

(PS2) DVD disc: 4.7GB (one layer), 8.54GB (two layers)

(X-Box) DVD disc: 4.7GB (one layer), 8.54GB (two layers) / Compact Disc: Around 700MB

(GameCube) Nintendo Optical disc (GCN 80mm) : 1.5GB

(PS3) Blu-Ray disc: 25GB (one layer), 50GB (two layers)

(Wii) Nintendo Optical disc (Wii 120mm) : 4.7GB (one layer), 8.5 (two layers)

(X-Box 360) DVD disc: 4.7GB (one layer), 8.54GB (two layers) / Compact Disc: Around 700MB

*cough* Researched.

Quote: alexis1213

I have a wii and the graphics for TEN were awesome!!!!

Because TEN's programing didn't take much space. The Wii disc's data storage is tiny compared to the Blu-Ray.

Quote: Gwenio

Quote: Forgotten World

I'm guessing that,

• PS3=60GB
  
• Xbox360=20GB
  
• Wii=2GB
  
• PS2=512MB
  
• Xbox=512MB
  
• GC=512MB
  
• PSP=128MB
  
• DS=32MB
  
• PS1=32MB
  
• Advance=512KB
  


• dreamcast=256MB
  

This is what I think, Just for your Information.

Edit: I forgot Xbox and Gamecube.

That is memory, not how fast it can process the graphic (which I posted earlier) which is more important to the quality. Memory decides the quantity that can be loaded a once (level size).

Once again: PS3: 550 MHz, XBox 360: 500 MHz. Wii: cannot find exact number, but unoffical infomation says 243 MHz. PS2: 147 MHz.

That could probably be figured out by researching on the offical sites.

Quote: Forgotten World

Let's see if the PS4 can get up to 10GHz. he he.

Well, seeing that the PS3 has 500MHz, why would the PS4's be much slower? HUH?

Quote: alexis1213

once u got him it's easy to get rid of him now it's takes me 3 to 4 minutes to get him slow down time when he gose to punch u and a few seconds before he hots u jump out of the way!

LOL

it only takes me 5 minutes to beat him altogether!

Quote: Shrazer320

Quote: Forgotten World

Let's see if the PS4 can get up to 10GHz. he he.

Well, seeing that the PS3 has 500MHz, why would the PS4's be much slower? HUH?

GHz instead of MHz, which if it works like memory 10 GHz = 1024*10 MHZ

So a GHz would be 1024X more than a MHz, thank you Gwenio. so the PS4 would be approximetly be 20X faster than the PS3 BooYeah ZI. * or something like them, Someone's gotta figure out how to master today's tecnology into a RWGP.*

Quote: DragonFriend244

Graphics on the Wii console will probablly look really cool!

Have you seen the Wii TEN graphics?

But that was because the Wii was the superior console to the PS2, so Krome and Sierra put more time into the development of that version.

The 360 and PS3 are graphically superior to the Wii. That much is true. But that does not mean the Wii cannot produce crystal-clear and vibrant 3D graphics. Super Mario Galaxy boasted excellent graphics for a 3D Mario game. And other games, like Zerodius stated, have demonstrated the Wii CAN produce graphics that can hold ground against the HD and Blue Ray of the 360 and PS3. Hopefully, Sierra will be able to assist EL in making an enjoyable Wii version, like they did for Krome in TEN.

Quote: HIR

Quote: DragonFriend244

Graphics on the Wii console will probablly look really cool!

Have you seen the Wii TEN graphics?

But that was because the Wii was the superior console to the PS2, so Krome and Sierra put more time into the development of that version.

The 360 and PS3 are graphically superior to the Wii. That much is true. But that does not mean the Wii cannot produce crystal-clear and vibrant 3D graphics. Super Mario Galaxy boasted excellent graphics for a 3D Mario game. And other games, like Zerodius stated, have demonstrated the Wii CAN produce graphics that can hold ground against the HD and Blue Ray of the 360 and PS3. Hopefully, Sierra will be able to assist EL in making an enjoyable Wii version, like they did for Krome in TEN.

Sierra? I thought that Etranges Libellules did the third TLoS game.

^ same

ok I better stop LOL every one on here say that the wii has good and bad graphics !!!!!!!

I know that the wii's got those great games, but Spyro games never did have the BEST graphics if you ask me. I'm not really sure Krome will put as much effort into the Wii version's graphics than the Xbox 360. Or maybe they will. I've no idea.

Same with me * no idea*

Quote: Forgotten World

Quote: HIR

Quote: DragonFriend244

Graphics on the Wii console will probablly look really cool!

Have you seen the Wii TEN graphics?

But that was because the Wii was the superior console to the PS2, so Krome and Sierra put more time into the development of that version.

The 360 and PS3 are graphically superior to the Wii. That much is true. But that does not mean the Wii cannot produce crystal-clear and vibrant 3D graphics. Super Mario Galaxy boasted excellent graphics for a 3D Mario game. And other games, like Zerodius stated, have demonstrated the Wii CAN produce graphics that can hold ground against the HD and Blue Ray of the 360 and PS3. Hopefully, Sierra will be able to assist EL in making an enjoyable Wii version, like they did for Krome in TEN.

Sierra? I thought that Etranges Libellules did the third TLoS game.

Notice I said Sierra will be able to assist EL. EL standing for Etranges Libellules (it's an annoying name to type). And EL is DEVELOPING the game, Sierra still oversees everything. >.>

Athough the Wii doesn't have the best graphics, the graphics may be improved if you hook the console up to a computer monitor. As you may know, all computer monitors are High Def, so unless you already have an awesome High Def TV, the graphics may be better on a monitor.

well out of all the game systems i have the wii is the best!!

maybe ill consider getting the Wii version at my dads place (because my dad said i cant bring the Wii at my moms place)

and ill buy the PS2 version here at me mum's

also i think PS3 in gonna be the best because it is second to none


trust me i played the PS3 and it truely kicks @$$ but not as much as the Wii because the Wii is more fun to use because of its TRUE six-axis function

ok here is how im gonna put it in short form

PS3= great graphic's but hurts the @$$ for sitting on the couch all day
Wii= not so great graphic's as the PS3's, but more fun to use and doesnt hurt the @$$ when playing it

by the way Denri you and me are same


WE BOTH HAVE ADHD!!!!

Quote: Dragon King

Wii is more fun to use because of its TRUE six-axis function

But it does not have all the nesicary buttons when using siz-axis (no numchuk).

Quote: Dragon King

PS3= great graphic's but hurts the @$$ for sitting on the couch all day
Wii= not so great graphic's as the PS3's, but more fun to use and doesnt hurt the @$$ when playing it

yes but wii can hurt your legs

Quote: Tango

Quote: Dragon King

PS3= great graphic's but hurts the @$$ for sitting on the couch all day
Wii= not so great graphic's as the PS3's, but more fun to use and doesnt hurt the @$$ when playing it

yes but wii can hurt your legs

And make your arm sore, Man was playing the Wii awsome...untill you find that you're first time at the Wii *espesally playing baceball* Made you very sore later on. I found out the hard way at the very end of 2007 to the very beginning of 2008.

They all look the same, whether it's Xbox, PS2 or Wii.

not really