personally for me its kind of weird to talk about this subject because somebody always has to mention that trope of an 1000 year old girl in a 5 year olds body. which of course is obviously weird because its a drawing of a 5 year old that they are attracted to. but when it comes to drawings that are obviously not teenagers like
![[User Posted Image]](https://comicvine.gamespot.com/a/uploads/original/11137/111374181/7056988-cfjodgquiaip5re.jpg)
![[User Posted Image]](https://assets-prd.ignimgs.com/2021/01/27/violet-evergarden-button-1611757901991.jpg)
but are labeled to be underaged it becomes an argument. obviously the creator in mind created these characters to look like fully grown people but they are labeled to be 17- for story reasons such as being in high school is more relatable or the anime was made for teenagers. but now we get to the part where everywhere starts to get mad or defensive. sexualizing these characters.
in my opinion I feel like sexualizing characters from anything where characters origin has nothing to do with sex appeal is kinda weird. like if you were to draw pics of captain underpants without his underpants it would be weird to me. but if you were to draw a pic of jessica rabbit in an interesting way it makes a lot more sense to me. which is why anime is so interesting. because sure there are characters who come from shows about being fire fighters but some of those characters also do it in bikinis.
the argument about being attracted or sexualizing anime teens is the big comeuppance on twitter and I feel like people are either full on anti 17- or think its ok to sexualize 17- anime characters. no in between. its either you cant like them because they are a minor and the other is its ok because its a fictional minor.
tbh I feel like both sides of the coin can get really silly. because in the end you are either attracted to a fictional character or you are defending a fictional character. characters that do not know you exist and also do not exist.