darkSpyro

To most scientists, the "memory of water" is not something that deserves serious consideration; the only evidence is the flawed Benveniste work. By contrast, the notion of "memory of water" has been taken seriously among homeopaths. For them, it seemed to be part of a possible explanation of why some of their remedies might work. An overview of the issues surrounding the memory of water was the subject of a special issue of Homeopathy. In an editorial, the editor of Homeopathy, Peter Fisher, acknowledged that Benveniste's original method does not yield reproducible results and declared "...the memory of water is a bad memory: it casts a long shadow over homeopathy and is just about all that many scientists recall about the scientific investigation of homeopathy, equating it with poor or even fraudulent science." The issue was an attempt to restore some credibility to the notion with articles proposing various, very different theories of water memory, such as: electromagnetic exchange of information between molecules, breaking of temporal symmetry, thermoluminescence, entanglement described by a new quantum theory, formation of hydrogen peroxide, clathrate formation, etc. Some of the proposed mechanisms would require overthrowing much of 20th century physics.[40]

all i know about memory of water is drinking a lot of it since last summer and having to pee every four seconds yooooooooooooooooo

^ You needed homeopathic coverage.

more like urinary tract coverage

^ You need mouth coverage.

why.........?????

To stop you from saying weird stuff.

Ii didn t even say anything weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeirdddddddddddddddddddddddd

Everything you say is weird.

n........................................no it isn t!

To most forum users, the "memory of Lindsey" is not something that deserves serious consideration; the only evidence is the flawed Benveniste work. By contrast, the notion of "memory of Lindsey" has been taken seriously among darkSpyro users. For them, it seemed to be part of a possible explanation of why some of their remedies might work. An overview of the issues surrounding the memory of Lindsey was the subject of a special issue of darkSpyropathy. In an editorial, the editor of darkSpyropathy, Alex Bates, acknowledged that Benveniste's original method does not yield reproducible results and declared "...the memory of Lindsey is a bad memory: it casts a long shadow over darkSpyropathy and is just about all that many forum users recall about the forum investigation of darkSpyropathy, equating it with poor or even fraudulent science." The issue was an attempt to restore some credibility to the notion with articles proposing various, very different theories of Lindsey memory, such as: electromagnetic exchange of information between users, breaking of temporal friendships, online dating, entanglement described by a new user theory, formation of hydrogen peroxide, user-bashing formation, etc. Some of the proposed mechanisms would require overthrowing much of 20th century physics.[40]

i don t know why but that legitimately made me feel bad...........................................lol need caffeiene or weed or somehting

What the ****? It was a joke. It was supposed to be funny...

ya know, i made this post bc a classmate in a science class gave a presentation about water memory as if there's scientific evidence of it (there isn't really)