Forum

Poll

13 Years of Skylanders, Have You Played Any?
View Results
Page 1 of 1
Obama in a nutshell. [CLOSED]
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#1 Posted: 21:10:19 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
[User Posted Image]

------
spyro and sonic Diamond Sparx Gems: 8502
#2 Posted: 21:28:04 28/03/2014
Get out. Just get out.
ThroneOfMalefor Platinum Sparx Gems: 5538
#3 Posted: 21:38:06 28/03/2014
JCW... is that you????
---
BREATHE AIR.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#4 Posted: 21:38:44 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: spyro and sonic
Get out. Just get out.



Oh I'm sorry, I was being racist.
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 21:42:41 28/03/2014 by Mrmorrises
wakapro77 Emerald Sparx Gems: 4341
#5 Posted: 21:59:34 28/03/2014
That is very stereotypical of you to think that.
---
hence, the yiffening shall come

I submit my art on my tumblr. PM me for the link.
Metallo Platinum Sparx Gems: 6419
#6 Posted: 22:11:38 28/03/2014
What the hell...?


Since when did Obama ever accuse ANYONE of being racist for simply opposing him? Yes, many Obama supporters do, but the President himself has never done it.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#7 Posted: 22:36:20 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: wakapro77
That is very stereotypical of you to think that.


By stereotypical do you mean I am stereotyping Obama, or I am being a stereotypical in this criticism of him?

Quote: Metallo
What the hell...?


Since when did Obama ever accuse ANYONE of being racist for simply opposing him? Yes, many Obama supporters do, but the President himself has never done it.



Well, he does respond to people questioning his nationality by calling them "racists". He's pretty much given the word "racist" a new meaning, and will bring race into any scenario involving someone who isn't white, such as the Professor Gates incident.
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 23:21:42 28/03/2014 by Mrmorrises
wakapro77 Emerald Sparx Gems: 4341
#8 Posted: 22:37:18 28/03/2014
Aren't you being racist in itself saying that?
---
hence, the yiffening shall come

I submit my art on my tumblr. PM me for the link.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#9 Posted: 22:43:20 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: wakapro77
Aren't you being racist in itself saying that?



By saying that Obama has redefined racism? No. If any president were to incorporate race into anything that is entirely independent of race, I would take note of it.
Samius Hunter Gems: 9550
#10 Posted: 22:56:38 28/03/2014
Obama is a great president, he just has too diverse an audience to please.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#11 Posted: 23:06:12 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Samius
Obama is a great president, he just has too diverse an audience to please.



Actually, I'd say that he has, unfortunately, done a great job pleasing his diverse crowd. Illegal immigrants under his immigration policies might as well be called "undocumented democrats", he turned gays into guaranteed pawns for votes for him, as he also did with women as he did with practically all of the minorities in America, because that's what he's all about, dividing the minorities from the majorities. The majorities in his case, being white straight men.
Lunarz Emerald Sparx Gems: 3498
#12 Posted: 23:10:04 28/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Samius
Obama is a great president, he just has too diverse an audience to please.



Actually, I'd say that he has, unfortunately, done a great job pleasing his diverse crowd. Illegal immigrants under his immigration policies might as well be called "undocumented democrats", he turned gays into guaranteed pawns for votes for him, as he also did with women as he did with practically all of the minorities in America, because that's what he's all about, dividing the minorities from the majorities. The majorities in his case, being white straight men.


But isn't politics about doing whatever you can to come out on top?
---
Lanky Kong saved me despite having no style nor grace.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#13 Posted: 23:11:51 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Lunarz
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Samius
Obama is a great president, he just has too diverse an audience to please.



Actually, I'd say that he has, unfortunately, done a great job pleasing his diverse crowd. Illegal immigrants under his immigration policies might as well be called "undocumented democrats", he turned gays into guaranteed pawns for votes for him, as he also did with women as he did with practically all of the minorities in America, because that's what he's all about, dividing the minorities from the majorities. The majorities in his case, being white straight men.


But isn't politics about doing whatever you can to come out on top?



It sure is. But it's also about what you do once you reach the top.
Samius Hunter Gems: 9550
#14 Posted: 23:25:27 28/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Actually, I'd say that he has, unfortunately, done a great job pleasing his diverse crowd. Illegal immigrants under his immigration policies might as well be called "undocumented democrats", he turned gays into guaranteed pawns for votes for him, as he also did with women as he did with practically all of the minorities in America, because that's what he's all about, dividing the minorities from the majorities. The majorities in his case, being white straight men.


I meant "politically diverse", but I guess that's one way to look at it so let's toss "biographically diverse" in too (if that's the right word).

Now, that's exactly what I meant. The majority (straight white men, as you put it) mostly dislike him because they mostly disagree with his actions. He can't possibly please everyone with a single course of action so I think he gets a lot of unwarranted hate.

And about his actions.. What's so negative about all that he has done then? From an objective point of view, of course.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#15 Posted: 23:49:31 28/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Samius
Quote: Mrmorrises
Actually, I'd say that he has, unfortunately, done a great job pleasing his diverse crowd. Illegal immigrants under his immigration policies might as well be called "undocumented democrats", he turned gays into guaranteed pawns for votes for him, as he also did with women as he did with practically all of the minorities in America, because that's what he's all about, dividing the minorities from the majorities. The majorities in his case, being white straight men.


I meant "politically diverse", but I guess that's one way to look at it so let's toss "biographically diverse" in too (if that's the right word).

Now, that's exactly what I meant. The majority (straight white men, as you put it) mostly dislike him because they mostly disagree with his actions. He can't possibly please everyone with a single course of action so I think he gets a lot of unwarranted hate.

And about his actions.. What's so negative about all that he has done then? From an objective point of view, of course.



Well, to start, as you said, the majority dislikes him because of every president we've ever had, he is the most aligned with the big M: Marxism, which puts what he does on the road to communism.

Step 1: He identifies the minorities (everyone except for white straight men in his case)

Step 2: He makes the minority group think that they are a VICTIM of the majority primarily based on the fact that they are different.

Step 3: He uses the power that the government should not have to "help" the minority.In Abraham Lincoln's maxim "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him how to fish, and he'll eat for the rest of his life." the federal government's helping of the minority is giving them the fish. Obama WANTS poverty, so that the federal government will be cued to help them, and eventually they will become reliant on the government. Completely reliant on it. So reliant that it's taken the route to communism.

And then lets look at the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), REQUIRING every citizen to spend money on health care. Do you know what's next on the list after that? Requiring every citizen to get VACCINES. Just like what Senator Ted Kennedy was talking about. Once the government can FORCE YOU to get a vaccine, or should I say, foreign particles injected into your body, there isn't much they can't do.

Overall, just an incredibly anti-American president making an attempt to bring the government's power beyond the constitution.
parisruelz12 Diamond Sparx Gems: 7577
#16 Posted: 00:36:32 29/03/2014
[User Posted Image]
-----
---
looks like ive got some things to do...
Metallo Platinum Sparx Gems: 6419
#17 Posted: 00:40:53 29/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Overall, just an incredibly anti-American president making an attempt to bring the government's power beyond the constitution.


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 00:48:23 29/03/2014 by Metallo
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#18 Posted: 00:58:49 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises
Overall, just an incredibly anti-American president making an attempt to bring the government's power beyond the constitution.


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. And then there's Franklin D. Roosevelt, who handled World War 2, and is considered a great President for his actions in it. He had those Japanese-American internment camps, which was one of the most atrocious parts of his leadership. I excuse Roosevelt, Wilson, and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 01:03:46 29/03/2014 by Mrmorrises
hardcoreignitor Gold Sparx Gems: 2583
#19 Posted: 01:00:40 29/03/2014
Harper 4 Ever
---
nyeheheheheh

hey lois, i’m dustah from mudda 3
Samius Hunter Gems: 9550
#20 Posted: 01:09:42 29/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Well, to start, as you said, the majority dislikes him because of every president we've ever had, he is the most aligned with the big M: Marxism, which puts what he does on the road to communism.

Step 1: He identifies the minorities (everyone except for white straight men in his case)

Step 2: He makes the minority group think that they are a VICTIM of the majority primarily based on the fact that they are different.

Step 3: He uses the power that the government should not have to "help" the minority.In Abraham Lincoln's maxim "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him how to fish, and he'll eat for the rest of his life." the federal government's helping of the minority is giving them the fish. Obama WANTS poverty, so that the federal government will be cued to help them, and eventually they will become reliant on the government. Completely reliant on it. So reliant that it's taken the route to communism.

And then lets look at the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), REQUIRING every citizen to spend money on health care. Do you know what's next on the list after that? Requiring every citizen to get VACCINES. Just like what Senator Ted Kennedy was talking about. Once the government can FORCE YOU to get a vaccine, or should I say, foreign particles injected into your body, there isn't much they can't do.

Overall, just an incredibly anti-American president making an attempt to bring the government's power beyond the constitution.


1. I don't see anything inherently "wrong" with that. It's not like the majority of the population is threatened in any way.
Besides, he would be a pretty dumb president not to try to identify with his people. In this case he just doesn't identify with the "right group", in some people's opinion.

2. Can you point me to where and how exactly he is victimizing minorities AND making the majority look guilty?
Besides, are you sure it's him and not just the way normal way of thinking for any population minority? Because it's always the same story, no matter what country you live in.

3. That's kinda vague, and his ends are completely up to speculation. How exactly is he aiding minorities?

Oh, you mean raising the tax rates to be able to provide every citizen with free basic healthcare? Sure sounds evil, no man should be forced to work towards raising the standard of living of the country he lives in.

Also, I kinda expected to see something about communism, but not in the first sentence.

See, I'm not an american as you might already know. I'm from Finland, and it's really hard for me to understand this.. "aversion" most americans have towards socialism. I can get why communism isn't good but that's not the same.
It's this ridiculous "with us or against us" -mindset that is to blame for most of it. And it's not even caused by the politicians, it's mostly the media, because there is big money to be made in setting these large political parties up for confrontation.
Nothing about Obama makes him a communist, but people still call him that, and believe it to some extent.
Metallo Platinum Sparx Gems: 6419
#21 Posted: 01:10:27 29/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises
Overall, just an incredibly anti-American president making an attempt to bring the government's power beyond the constitution.


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. I excuse both Wilson and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.



Who says war is the only stressful time a country faces? When we're facing the worst economic trouble we've had in decades, the most atrocious health issues the country has EVER experienced, and the increasing difficulty of friendly foreign relations, none of which the Constitution can give adequate advice for, why is it wrong for the President to expand his power a bit, just as the countless others did before him?

Also, you may not have noticed, but we are INVOLVED in a major war right now that also involves almost every significant First World country on the planet - a war that you Republicans have motivated out of greed.

Quote: Samius
See, I'm not an american as you might already know. I'm from Finland, and it's really hard for me to understand this.. "aversion" most americans have towards socialism. I can get why communism isn't good but that's not the same.



Simple. It's our backwards, absurdly right-wing culture that teaches us to never trust any sort of authority and that the government is ALWAYS trying to screw us.

Also, the ones like Mrmorrises who glorify said backwards culture.
Edited 2 times - Last edited at 01:17:18 29/03/2014 by Metallo
Big Green Platinum Sparx Gems: 6372
#22 Posted: 01:10:58 29/03/2014
every president was ****
Kitty Platinum Sparx Gems: 5106
#23 Posted: 01:14:14 29/03/2014
i voted for mitt romney cuz hes white smilie
wakapro77 Emerald Sparx Gems: 4341
#24 Posted: 01:16:07 29/03/2014
only racists think chris rock isnt funny!!!!!!!!!!!
---
hence, the yiffening shall come

I submit my art on my tumblr. PM me for the link.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#25 Posted: 01:25:18 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Metallo


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. I excuse both Wilson and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.



Who says war is the only stressful time a country faces? When we're facing the worst economic trouble we've had in decades, the most atrocious health issues the country has EVER experienced, and the increasing difficulty of friendly foreign relations, none of which the Constitution can give adequate advice for, why is it wrong for the President to expand his power a bit, just as the countless others did before him?


I never meant to imply that war was the only stressful things countries face. I use the comparison of the President expanding his power in times of stress that don't include war, to the victims of the stress being stranded on an island, then the President sends his "boat" to get them off the island. Once they're on the "boat" of the President, they play by his rules. It can only go one way, and that is, the president getting more power hungry. If you've taken AP US History, like I have, you probably know of Franklin Roosevelt's horrible court packing scheme in 1937, which is an excellent example of this. Roosevelt wanted to further bring out his New Deal, and he found the Supreme Court to be a handicap on that and he tried to solve it in an incredibly power-hungry way. I'm not saying that Socialism and increased Presidential power are horrible and only harms us, as they have proven to be helpful at times, but once the President claims the power to do him, there's very little to stop him from doing the next thing, and even though that next thing probably isn't extreme, it's taking yet another step up the ladder to dictatorship.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#26 Posted: 01:39:43 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Metallo


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. I excuse both Wilson and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.



Who says war is the only stressful time a country faces? When we're facing the worst economic trouble we've had in decades, the most atrocious health issues the country has EVER experienced, and the increasing difficulty of friendly foreign relations, none of which the Constitution can give adequate advice for, why is it wrong for the President to expand his power a bit, just as the countless others did before him?

Also, you may not have noticed, but we are INVOLVED in a major war right now that also involves almost every significant First World country on the planet - a war that you Republicans have motivated out of greed.

Quote: Samius
See, I'm not an american as you might already know. I'm from Finland, and it's really hard for me to understand this.. "aversion" most americans have towards socialism. I can get why communism isn't good but that's not the same.



Simple. It's our backwards, absurdly right-wing culture that teaches us to never trust any sort of authority and that the government is ALWAYS trying to screw us.

Also, the ones like Mrmorrises who glorify said backwards culture.



You're confusing the blunt phrase "Screw us" with "Loosely interpret or disregard the constitution to the point that the federal government is able to dictate our lives in practically every way" It doesn't necessarily screw us, unless you like having basic rights.
wakapro77 Emerald Sparx Gems: 4341
#27 Posted: 02:46:18 29/03/2014
[User Posted Image]

.........
---
hence, the yiffening shall come

I submit my art on my tumblr. PM me for the link.
Wreckingball13 Gold Sparx Gems: 2583
#28 Posted: 02:52:12 29/03/2014
Plot Twist. Obama is a racist.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#29 Posted: 03:13:57 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Metallo


And you seriously think he's the only President who ever did this?

Do you know which President used more executive, non-Constitutional power than any other in history?

Abraham Lincoln. The founder of your "Grand Ole Party."


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. I excuse both Wilson and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.



Who says war is the only stressful time a country faces? When we're facing the worst economic trouble we've had in decades, the most atrocious health issues the country has EVER experienced, and the increasing difficulty of friendly foreign relations, none of which the Constitution can give adequate advice for, why is it wrong for the President to expand his power a bit, just as the countless others did before him?

Also, you may not have noticed, but we are INVOLVED in a major war right now that also involves almost every significant First World country on the planet - a war that you Republicans have motivated out of greed.



Really now? Did you ever think that if the DEMOCRATS let us drill for oil in Alaska, rather than going for foreign oil, the war would be less motivated?
Metallo Platinum Sparx Gems: 6419
#30 Posted: 03:18:13 29/03/2014
Quote: Mrmorrises
Quote: Metallo
Quote: Mrmorrises


Well, we're looking at greatly different time periods here, but Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the habeus corpus, although stepping out of the constitution was done during a time of war. Civil War. Woodrow Wilson, a president belonging to your "Grand Ole Party" had thousands of people sent to jail for being political opponents of his during World War 1. I excuse both Wilson and Lincoln for these dictator-like tactics because this was a time of major war. Now there's no massive World war or Civil war erupting, and Obama is slowly but surely breaking out of the constitution.



Who says war is the only stressful time a country faces? When we're facing the worst economic trouble we've had in decades, the most atrocious health issues the country has EVER experienced, and the increasing difficulty of friendly foreign relations, none of which the Constitution can give adequate advice for, why is it wrong for the President to expand his power a bit, just as the countless others did before him?

Also, you may not have noticed, but we are INVOLVED in a major war right now that also involves almost every significant First World country on the planet - a war that you Republicans have motivated out of greed.



Really now? Did you ever think that if the DEMOCRATS let us drill for oil in Alaska, rather than going for foreign oil, the war would be less motivated?



Maybe, maybe not. I don't identify myself as a Democrat. All I know is, this country's political state is far too ambiguous to be judged by one single viewpoint - especially not from one who has no political experience.
MoonHorizons Gold Sparx Gems: 2826
#31 Posted: 04:42:26 29/03/2014
WHAT.
---
the more obscure your favorite cartoons are, the more refined your taste is
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 04:42:38 29/03/2014 by MoonHorizons
parisruelz12 Diamond Sparx Gems: 7577
#32 Posted: 04:45:39 29/03/2014
[User Posted Image]


-----------
---
looks like ive got some things to do...
aran Emerald Sparx Gems: 4040
#33 Posted: 04:55:26 29/03/2014
it's funny how everyone forgets what gorge bush put us in trillions of dollars in debt. started a war with a country that did nothing to us. pretend hucrain katrina was not happening. and many more :/
papa123 Yellow Sparx Gems: 1372
#34 Posted: 10:37:06 29/03/2014
I agree. Obama is horrible.
---
"And now this world shall now Pain!"
wreckingballbob Emerald Sparx Gems: 4565
#35 Posted: 10:53:01 29/03/2014
What does he do? Nothing for me.
---
5.7.
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#36 Posted: 16:17:14 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: Pixilism
mrmorrises youre like 9 years old U DONT KNOW ANYTHING



If anyone shows a lack of knowledge in this case, it's you. I'm a white man, and if you say those things to me, you're racist! (Obama logic)
Blackholes_Wolf Ripto Gems: 10760
#37 Posted: 16:21:25 29/03/2014
dS discussing politics is my guilty pleasure
Mrmorrises Platinum Sparx Gems: 7158
#38 Posted: 16:27:26 29/03/2014 | Topic Creator
Quote: aran
it's funny how everyone forgets what gorge bush put us in trillions of dollars in debt. started a war with a country that did nothing to us. pretend hucrain katrina was not happening. and many more :/



"Bush put us trillions of dollars in debt" He's a dumbass who's screwing us over with his incredible supidity.
"Bush pretended hurricane Katrina was not happening. (some ven say that he caused it" He's an evil mastermind who's using his intelligence to screw us.

Make up your mind, is Bush an incredible dumbass who's trying to help but is failing, or an evil mastermind who's cleverly trying to screw us over.
HIR Diamond Sparx Gems: 9034
#39 Posted: 23:39:14 29/03/2014
This topic does not have a picture of Obama in a nut's shell. THIS IS BLATANT FALSE ADVERTISING. *shot* x.x;
---
Congrats! You wasted five seconds reading this.
Page 1 of 1

Please login or register a forum account to post a message.

Username Password Remember Me