darkSpyro

Sometimes I think about some users that got banned that still had big moments of niceness and good actions and wonder if they ever got better after it, or they just doubled down in being edgy and pushing others away for the lols

- - -

fall guys switch when thats all i care about at this point

i mean ive hopped on the trend on PS4 but only like 3 people i know have a PS4 while everyone has switch i just wanna play with people dammit

I'm just waiting for Silksong, now that Bayonetta 3 is on the happy animals farm for a few more years

Waiting for SMTV gameplay....and a release date, glad to learn Nexomon Extinction is an hard title as that could fill temporary that urge, also was the theme of that direct, music or what? «Theatrythm Kingdom Hearts(Melody of Memory), a rythm RPG and Just Dance, hope that September onwards will get better in term of announcements because on the Nintendo side, Christmas season will be weak....however Crystal Chronicles is tomorrow.

Quote: Vespi

i mean ive hopped on the trend on PS4 but only like 3 people i know have a PS4 while everyone has switch i just wanna play with people dammit

I have become the very thing I sought to destroy in Fall Guys for the PS4
A Grabber

oh no, that's not very werewolves of you

if i didnt get my 2015 back to the future future in real life then god damn it i want 2688 to be like the bill and ted future
our future HAS to be based off an 80's or 90's movie it HAS to be or i have nothing to live for

Any video or live production produced in 2020 will be instantly aged once this pandemic passes-- and people in 2021/beyond look back at it.

before nintendo direct


after nintendo direct

I BOUGHT MINI GLOW IN THE DARK DRAGONS

I'M SO EXCITED

spellbreak legitimately looks cool

Ya boy kite wants to commit interior design crimes

Mfw most statistics are inaccurate

Less than 13 hours until I get to watch the Owl House finale, so thats fun

Working at shield really sucks. Every other week someone's trying to takeover, your friends are secretly Nazis, you're pretty much a disposable body, etc

Quote: somePerson

Working at shield really sucks. Every other week someone's trying to takeover, your friends are secretly Nazis, you're pretty much a disposable body, etc

join damage control, no ones a nazi there and u just clean

Quote: Drednaw

i have the wikipedia page of "world's largest statues" open at all times

i just think they're neat

oh you think youre a statue fan? name all of the worlds biggest statues

owned

Ea is the worst and most evil company because they do microtransactions. Unlike other companies who literally enslave people in foreign countries and murder them.

well you see sp that doesn't inconvenience me personally so who cares

I dreamt that my dS account got deleted for no reason and my only concern was the quotes stored in my guestbook, now lost forever.

knowing something you've made or done has brought at least one other person joy is nice

Quote: Carmelita Fox

well you see sp that doesn't inconvenience me personally so who cares

I don't understand your argument so I'm just gonna post a clown emoji to prove me right >:(

More I’m playing Persona games(4 Golden and 5 precisely), more I want games like it and can’t find anything, they generally only have the social sim and not the complex, dark themes that make them so interesting. I also really want more adult oriented monster collecting RPGs like SMT(Shin Megami Tensei).

I don't think science should be a part of psychology. In fact I believe science ruins psychology

oh no it's stupid

Quote: Sesshomaru75

Quote: somePerson

I don't think science should be a part of psychology. In fact I believe science ruins psychology

Psychology is a type of science, though???

Psychology itself is way to very young subject about 150ish years old. It wasnt that long ago when we thought Freudian beliefs were accurate. Since psychology was created tons of discovered based off of other discoverys were made such as integral calculas go prove the laws of gravity. Psychology makes discoveres based upon feelings, emotions, and psuedo science.

The term psychology is also super different with many branches changing very often. Psychology right now as a field is a socal science which means that a lot of it's theories originate from refutable data that is always changing.

Psychology is a young study that uses elements of science in it but I don't believe we will ever get to a point where the brain and human emotions can be perfectively defined to where it is a pure science.

Okay but like. Science is also always changing? In the same way Psychology is? Social Science?

Quote:

Psychology itself is way to very young subject about 150ish years old. It wasnt that long ago when we thought Freudian beliefs were accurate. Since psychology was created tons of discovered based off of other discoverys were made such as integral calculas go prove the laws of gravity. Psychology makes discoveres based upon feelings, emotions, and psuedo science.

The term psychology is also super different with many branches changing very often. Psychology right now as a field is a socal science which means that a lot of it's theories originate from refutable data that is always changing.

Psychology is a young study that uses elements of science in it but I don't believe we will ever get to a point where the brain and human emotions can be perfectively defined to where it is a pure science.

As someone who is currently studying psychology in hopes to further research in my field, I'd like to politely disagree with you there, SP.

While psych is a new science, you can also argue that most other sciences are new as well. What about people who are studying COVID right now? Are they not frequently changing information in the way that psychology does as well? Are they not unsure about most of the information that they're giving us. By that flawed logic, you're also doubting medical research.

Science is something based off of RESEARCH, TRIAL, and ERROR. Psychology is conducted of multiple studies just like any other science is. While there are things that are based off of philosophy and faulty information, the information in our textbooks are ever changing to support the fact that these things can be considered wrong.

And while people like Sigmund Freud are absolute nutcases, you can argue that his findings are what got us to where we are today.

The world is a very newly discovered thing as a whole. Our world is nowhere near fully explored yet and we are constantly finding out new things about it. I'd like to see what you think when the next breakthrough about astronomy, psychics, biology, psychology, and any other science contradicts past findings. Will that mean that said branch of science would be inaccurate too?

Quote: derpyhooves

While psych is a new science, you can also argue that most other sciences are new as well. What about people who are studying COVID right now? Are they not frequently changing information in the way that psychology does as well? Are they not unsure about most of the information that they're giving us. By that flawed logic, you're also doubting medical research.

while i wholeheartedly agree with the rest of your post, even though COVID-19 is a new disease, it’s still being studied by epidemiologists, and the practice of studying infectious diseases has been around since the 1800s
it’s not the best comparison, something like the study of robotics would probably be closer in age to psychology

things that make you go hmm

Quote: Vespi

Quote: derpyhooves

While psych is a new science, you can also argue that most other sciences are new as well. What about people who are studying COVID right now? Are they not frequently changing information in the way that psychology does as well? Are they not unsure about most of the information that they're giving us. By that flawed logic, you're also doubting medical research.

while i wholeheartedly agree with the rest of your post, even though COVID-19 is a new disease, it’s still being studied by epidemiologists, and the practice of studying infectious diseases has been around since the 1800s
it’s not the best comparison, something like the study of robotics would probably be closer in age to psychology

You're right, but I guess my point is that nothing was known about it up until recently. I even heard that some scientists are doubting that it's a fully respiratory disease right now. :0

Quote: derpyhooves

Quote:

Psychology itself is way to very young subject about 150ish years old. It wasnt that long ago when we thought Freudian beliefs were accurate. Since psychology was created tons of discovered based off of other discoverys were made such as integral calculas go prove the laws of gravity. Psychology makes discoveres based upon feelings, emotions, and psuedo science.

The term psychology is also super different with many branches changing very often. Psychology right now as a field is a socal science which means that a lot of it's theories originate from refutable data that is always changing.

Psychology is a young study that uses elements of science in it but I don't believe we will ever get to a point where the brain and human emotions can be perfectively defined to where it is a pure science.

As someone who is currently studying psychology in hopes to further research in my field, I'd like to politely disagree with you there, SP.

While psych is a new science, you can also argue that most other sciences are new as well. What about people who are studying COVID right now? Are they not frequently changing information in the way that psychology does as well? Are they not unsure about most of the information that they're giving us. By that flawed logic, you're also doubting medical research.

Science is something based off of RESEARCH, TRIAL, and ERROR. Psychology is conducted of multiple studies just like any other science is. While there are things that are based off of philosophy and faulty information, the information in our textbooks are ever changing to support the fact that these things can be considered wrong.

And while people like Sigmund Freud are absolute nutcases, you can argue that his findings are what got us to where we are today.

The world is a very newly discovered thing as a whole. Our world is nowhere near fully explored yet and we are constantly finding out new things about it. I'd like to see what you think when the next breakthrough about astronomy, psychics, biology, psychology, and any other science contradicts past findings. Will that mean that said branch of science would be inaccurate too?

The thing about discoveries about most social sciences is that a lot of it's information from discoveries will always have Social and cultural elements at play which keeps it from being considered a pure hard science. This is different from hard science having contradictory discoveries because those discoveries will usually have a basis based around other discoveries and what not

I love psychology when I took classes about it and enjoy reading about it. But just because i don't think science should play a major role in it doesn't mean that it's bad or anything. But at this point it's just too topsy turvey to be a pure science. And yes researching covid has a name. It's virology.

Akihiko Sanada makes me feel very happy