I still think it was a really bad idea for Brazil to go and host both the World Cup and the Olympics back to back. It's risky and a loss of cash as it is to host one of those (Montreal is still hurting 40 years after their Olympics).
Quote: QueenChrysalisthat being some bull**** sports competition that nobody in the real world gives a bleeding **** about.
The Olympics have been a pioneer in peaceful and friendly competition for literally millennia, and have been a driving force for good despite the committee itself being a corrupt organization today. It shines light on the city and country hosting it (positive and negative) and shows us differing cultures from around the world in this increasingly connected and yet fractured world. Thousands of people train their entire lives and built up to the moment of being able to compete and get a gold medal not just for themselves but for their country. This and the World Cup are arguably the
one time patriotism is a good thing.
For countries like the US and China it's really just a formality to get a medal and it just adds onto the pile of 100+ they get. But for smaller countries that don't usually get medals it's a huge national deal and a cause for celebration as that person or team gets cemented in history and honored.
I would disagree and argue with you if you said baseball or basketball or whatever were pointless sports (I don't think any sport is meaningless no matter how much angry nerds want to say they do). But to try and claim that the Olympics (or the World Cup) didn't matter is absolutely ridiculous and I'm sorry but I severely disagree on your belief.
These Olympics are building up to be a ****show no doubt, and there's a lot of danger and I don't fault anybody for wanting to keep their athletes away. And what happened to the Australian team is horrible. But it's not like they went there for no reason.