I get that hentai/fetish art is not supposed to make sense.
But my thing is if you're gonna do fetish art, it's much more appealing if the fetishes are tailoured to the character. That way, people who actually like those characters are more likely to actually care and your art is more likely to be found and appreciated. That's why I find enforcing random fetishes on characters that don't represent them as weird. It's not as jarring with basic proportion exaggeration or something but like, why portray a character in the exact opposite fetishes they would realistically represent when people who like the character often won't care for the fetishes, and people who like the fetishes don't care for the character? It's just a weird logic thing I've never understood, since the artist would get better recognition if they appealed to their demographic properly. Otherwise, you're just giving fans of the character and fans of the fetish things they both don't like and you get less happy campers.
I mean:
>Rosalina is canonically 7'7" by default
>Rosalina is a mother figure
>Rosalina can turn into a giantess (so one could reasonably believe her changing the proportions of individual body parts at any time)
>Has all kinds of magic and powers
>Heavy class in Mario Kart, Power Class in Sports, always one of the best characters statistically in her playable appearances
People are way more interested in her being dominant yet motherly in lewd arts while also playing around with her powers. Rather than just doing generic bondage and vore stuff with her all of the time. That's what Peach is for.
Also "boo" at people who draw her as the same size as Peach, like why? That's taking away a very obvious signature thing people like about her.
I dunno. It's just a pet peeve of mine I guess.
Also this is cool, but also weird because of the uncanny valley effect.