GameMaster78
Emerald Sparx
Gems: 3321
|
#215 Posted: 02:03:36 13/12/2012
Constructive criticism isn't bad at all.
If TFB wants to make a franchise that can be all it can be, they would listen. Us fans could go to helping them ensure the franchise lasts as long as possible.
One way to kill a franchise, though, is to bring out a sequel that doesn't go above and beyond what the first game offers. Them nerfing characters who have done all Heroics in the first game, in Giants, isn't a good start. That will forever make me mad, because it was one of the things I was looking forward to the most. Now, I refuse to do the Heroics of the second game, because I feel I will lose those stats in the third game.
Online would be great. My friends are the type that say, "oh, if it isn't a AAA, M-Rated franchise, with realistic graphics, it's crap." These are friends who I used to have get togethers with to play simple games like Worms (PS1/Dreamcast), WCW/NWO Revenge (N64), or Power Stone (Dreamcast).
Online could open up a realm of possibilities for the Skylanders franchise, including official tournaments. Smash Bros. got into the mix of the, Skylanders could, too. Plus, it would just be fun to go through the game with friends that you made all over the world.
Another big no-no, was only making the game 16 chapters. The levels were bigger, as I stated before, but when making a sequel (even if you only have 1 year to get it planned and out), you got to 1-up the previous version, or people will start to lose interest. I don't want Skylanders being the next Guitar Hero, which is dead.
Again, if TFB is going to stretch out character releases for any number of months, make it so everyone will want to go back to the game during that period. They can do this by making the same number of Adventure Packs, which would still include a Skylander, Adventure Level, and 2 Magical Items - which I miss - as months they're stretching out the release of characters. This gaurentees 2 things -
1: There will at least be 1 new level per month which is a reason to go back
2: The customers will get at least 1 new Skylander every month, or more than 1 on the months a new wave hits
I have so many ideas for Skylanders, that would just rock. If they're not ideas for the gameplay itself, they're ideas for physical objects. For instance, I wish TFB would make a certain amount of Magical Items per year. Magical Items are a very cool aspect of the Skylanders game. I always thought to myself, "man, if this becomes an annual franchise, I can't wait to have a huge collection of magical items to collect and use." Giants is only giving us 2 (3 if you count Golden which is a redeco that unlocks a Battle Arena the normal doesn't but it still does the same ingame).
With Magical Items, I imagined building a shelf one day, where I would have a long row full of Magical Items. Same with Adventure Levels.
Even if TFB made Adventure Packs every year, they should also make a package that would hang on pegs. It would be a Magical Item Booster Pack and would contain 4 Magical Items per pack. The sky is the limit on Magical Items. TFB just needs to be motivated to make a true masterpiece of interactivity. It shouldn't just begin and end with Skylander figures.
I, honestly, think they should ditch the Lightcore idea. That kind of time could have gone to making more Magical Items. Instead, 8 characters in Giants are the same, minus a lightup feature and the Flashbomb effect. There could have been 8 more NEW Core Skylanders, or a focus on something like Magical Items. Instead, over the course of 2 games, there is literally 3 versions of 4 figures (Hex, Drobot, Eruptor and Prism Break), and 2 versions of 4 characters that might end up being 3 if they continue this Series 2 stuff (Shroomboom, Jet-Vac, Chill and Pop Fizz).
That brings me to Series 2. After they do the remaining 8 Series 1, and maybe the 8 Skylanders from Giants, they should end this Series stuff. There's no need to play the Beanie Babies game. I don't think kids are going to grow up saying, "oh, I have Camo Series 1. He's a retired mold." That kind of crap died when comics, cards, and a mass number of people buying Star Wars Episode 1 toys, died. If you don't have comics and cards from the 40's/50's, forget it. Nothing is worth anything. The Skylander franchise should be a physical Pokemon. In other words, gotta catch'em all, but in catching them all, they should be unique. I don't consider Series 2, or Lightcores as part of the unique collection. In my eyes, there are only 48 Skylanders, with "Shinies and Legendaries" versions (ie Legendary and ingame variants).
I would like to see that number grow to as much as Pokemon has one day, but if they focus on making Series 2, Series 3, Series 1,000,000, those resources are wasted. Now, my theory has always been - and I told my neighbor this so I hope I'm not wrong because he's buying Series 2 figures due to my theory - that Series 2 figures are just futureproofed figures, since TFB didn't forsee Skylanders taking off like it did. In other words, Series 2 figures, as well as the new Skylanders and Giants, are made to receive future upgrades should TFB want to give them new upgrades in each new game. I told my neighbor that theory, and I hope I'm right, as I don't need 10 version of Hex filling up my room.
Finally, to Giants. They need to end the Giants thing, for the sake of the story. I didn't see any other Giants fighting the battle against the Arkeyans, so it should stay at 8. The Elder Elementals, right? One thing I don't like about Giants, is that these Elder Elementals - according to the lore of the first game - could harness the powers of light and darkness, yet in Giants, they're just Giants in the same 8 elements. I didn't see this power mentioned in the lore. In Skylanders 3, these Giants should show that power.
If they revealed new Giants, it wouldn't make sense, seeing as they weren't there to help their friends. I just think they should leave it at 8 Giants, plus the packaging is too big. PLEASE GOD, ALMIGHTY, don't do Series 2 of the Giants. I had originally thought, "oh, well they did 24 Series 2 for Giants, they will do 24 for Skylanders 3." Those 24 would be the 8 Series 1 that didn't get a Series 2, Series 2 of the 8 new Skylanders, and 8 Series 2 Giants.
I bought into this franchise to get UNIQUE Skylanders every year. I swear on my life, I am 99% for sure I won't buy anymore Series 2 after this game. They could come with 5 new moves, but I don't like to double-dip on figures when it comes to them being unique, as odd as that sounds, seeing as I buy multiples of every figure to experience both upgrade paths.
If I didn't care about this franchise, I wouldn't have written an essay about it. I just want what I think would be best for this franchise. However, I am sitting here twiddling my thumbs, waiting for new figures for a game I've beaten 3 days after release. There is something wrong with that. They need to make it so people will go back to the game at least once a month, but nerfing a Skylander after they did all Heroics in the first game, only for those stats to disappear in the second game, and making a game that doesn't last as long as the stretched out release of figures, might hurt things in the end. I don't want to see that for what is one of my top 5 favorite franchises ever.
---
Wii U: GameMaster1178, XBL: GameMaster1178, PSN: megax28
|