darkSpyro - Spyro and Skylanders Forum > Skylanders: Giants > Nintendo World Report rates Skylanders Giants 95 of 100!
Page 1 of 1
Nintendo World Report rates Skylanders Giants 95 of 100! [CLOSED]
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#1 Posted: 15:33:56 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
http://community.skylanders.co...9/95-out-of-100

http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/review/32161


Wowsers, just, wowsers.
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
Edited 2 times - Last edited at 15:37:58 29/10/2012 by Matteomax
Alcatalog Blue Sparx Gems: 753
#2 Posted: 15:40:10 29/10/2012
Jeez I liked it but not that much hahaha
---
Got 38
kappapopm Ripto Gems: 1186
#3 Posted: 16:36:16 29/10/2012
a 85 score i could have believed, but this nope... someone got bribed to give that score... that is for sure.
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#4 Posted: 16:39:23 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
PSST, I'll give ya a Scarlet Ninjini and all of the new Sidekicks if you give us a good rating!
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
Aura24 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6561
#5 Posted: 16:44:34 29/10/2012
Quote: kappapopm
a 85 score i could have believed, but this nope... someone got bribed to give that score... that is for sure.


A lot of fans who hated SSA said the same thing about NWR's review of the game.
---
"Soon all of Skylands will tremble at the awesome might of Malefor, the Undead Dragon King!"
kappapopm Ripto Gems: 1186
#6 Posted: 16:44:59 29/10/2012
Quote: Matteomax
PSST, I'll give ya a Scarlet Ninjini and all of the new Sidekicks if you give us a good rating!



heck yah.... thats how it was done i bet...
kappapopm Ripto Gems: 1186
#7 Posted: 16:46:53 29/10/2012
Quote: Aura24
Quote: kappapopm
a 85 score i could have believed, but this nope... someone got bribed to give that score... that is for sure.


A lot of fans who hated SSA said the same thing about NWR's review of the game.


i don't hate but this is not better than skyrim game wise, you see where i am going with this...
spyrodadragon Green Sparx Gems: 490
#8 Posted: 16:48:19 29/10/2012
wait is 95 good cause it doesn't sound good
---
everyone spam this now Posted Image: http://cdn.memegenerator.net/i...0x/30597908.jpg
or the enderman will kill you
avatar by kap
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#9 Posted: 16:52:16 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
Its near perfect. 100 is perfectly flawless.
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
Aura24 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6561
#10 Posted: 16:52:34 29/10/2012
Quote: kappapopm
Quote: Aura24
Quote: kappapopm
a 85 score i could have believed, but this nope... someone got bribed to give that score... that is for sure.


A lot of fans who hated SSA said the same thing about NWR's review of the game.


i don't hate but this is not better than skyrim game wise, you see where i am going with this...


Yes I do, it's just the comment reminded me of the hate comments that were on the NWR's review page of SSA last year.
---
"Soon all of Skylands will tremble at the awesome might of Malefor, the Undead Dragon King!"
Bifrost Prismatic Sparx Gems: 10386
#11 Posted: 16:55:47 29/10/2012
I don't think they gave it a 95 because it's good by itself,they gave it because they took SSA up to eleven in all good things it had,then added some more.
We all know,without the toys,it's mediocre.But while SSA would pretty much be forgotten without it,Giants has the insane difficulty,interesting story and everything looks prettier and cooler than before. It's a good game with toys or without them,and damn,how good it can be.
They might've overdone it,of course, since the reviewer likes the series.A 90 is fine,but 95 is just like Pokémon Black getting maximum rating in some places back then.It's awesome,we know it,but letting the hype change the rating is not a good thing to do.
---
SO I'LL GIVE YOU WHAT YOU WANT
(What I need is never what I want)
WUMBOSIMPSON Yellow Sparx Gems: 1424
#12 Posted: 19:57:42 29/10/2012
Do they rate by money income?
---
cry baby, I am
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#13 Posted: 20:02:26 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
If it was, S:SA would have ben rated 10,000,000 out of 10.
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
WUMBOSIMPSON Yellow Sparx Gems: 1424
#14 Posted: 20:04:10 29/10/2012
Do they rate by money income?
---
cry baby, I am
Slivers Yellow Sparx Gems: 1387
#15 Posted: 20:12:41 29/10/2012
Everyone, take a deep breath.

Hold it.

Exhale.

Gooooood ...

Now, comparing an E10 game aimed at children/collectors/younger audiences/families/etc with games of differing genres and target audience, like Skyrim, serves zero purpose and yields only "personal preference" as a result. smilie Instead, let's put S:G up against another recent release which has the same target audience; Pokemon Black 2/White 2 which IGN gave a raving 9.6 http://www.ign.com/articles/20...ersion-2-review!

My kids have both. I have played both. Both are awesome games which both boys, 10 and 7 years of age, love. Do I think Pokemon Black2/White 2 is better than S:G? Nope. Nor do I think S:G is necessarily better than Pokemon Black 2/White 2.

Although IGN's P:B2/W2 review was higher than many, it wasn't out of bounds nor disputed as being "slanted". Looked at in this light, Nintendo World Report's S:G rating of 95 of 100 shouldn't be criticized as "slanted" either, even if the score is not what you would give it.
Edited 2 times - Last edited at 20:14:51 29/10/2012 by Slivers
D-Rex Blue Sparx Gems: 815
#16 Posted: 20:23:45 29/10/2012
Quote: kappapopm
Quote: Aura24
Quote: kappapopm
a 85 score i could have believed, but this nope... someone got bribed to give that score... that is for sure.


A lot of fans who hated SSA said the same thing about NWR's review of the game.


i don't hate but this is not better than skyrim game wise, you see where i am going with this...



But Skyrim wasn't all that good. Other games in the Elder Scrolls series was better.
---
smiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmiliesmilie
Shroomy_Boomy Yellow Sparx Gems: 1143
#17 Posted: 20:35:02 29/10/2012
^ TRUTH!! The other Elder Scroll games are WAY better than Skyrim... I was not a fan of Skyrim at all but i love the Elder Scroll series otherwise!! The Nintendo World article was good, thanks for sharing it Matteomax!
---
67/67+GITD:smiliesmiliesmilieAEsmilie ROCKsmilie&smilieGLITTERsmilie&smilieSNOWsmilie

37/37+All Sidekix~WERDS~Blusmilie~Flockedsmilie~GITDsmilie~GREENsmilie~CLEARsmilie~CHROMEsmilie
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#18 Posted: 21:14:46 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
Sure! It was on the Skylanders website, featured on the main screen, along with the TRU Hot Toy List, and Skylanders Giants US Tour Dates.
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
LordsOfSkulls Green Sparx Gems: 219
#19 Posted: 22:09:18 29/10/2012
i kinda liked Skyrim's World more than the other Elder Scrolls, but i kinda liked the story line for main quest in Oblivion more than Skyrim.
---
The Mind Is The Slayer Of Reality - LoS
Nibelilt Ripto Gems: 401
#20 Posted: 22:36:12 29/10/2012
Actually, I'd personally give it 9/10.
I think Giants deserves the overrated love that Adventure got. Every day I pop into Metacritic to see if there are more reviews. Every day the 3DS version doesn't have one, and the others only have a few.
HIR Diamond Sparx Gems: 9034
#21 Posted: 23:13:29 29/10/2012
GameTrailers gave the game a 6.7, stating Skylanders Giants "played it disappointingly safe." I am quite inclined to agree from what I've seen. >.>
---
Congrats! You wasted five seconds reading this.
Matteomax Platinum Sparx Gems: 5378
#22 Posted: 23:20:05 29/10/2012 | Topic Creator
What did Nintendo Power give them?
---
Will still be checking the forums every now and then!
bionicle2809 Diamond Sparx Gems: 8438
#23 Posted: 23:25:18 29/10/2012
...95? Seriously? I'd probably give it the same I gave SSA - 8/10. It was better in a lot of ways than the first but, as HIR mentioned from the GameTrailers review, they did kind of play it a bit too safe.
UncleBob Ripto Gems: 4565
#24 Posted: 00:58:50 30/10/2012
Wow. Pretty low-brow to accuse a fan site such as NWR of rigging review scores in exchange for free stuff based off one single article that's written based of one individuals' personal preference.
Aura24 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6561
#25 Posted: 01:07:32 30/10/2012
^Skylanders haters had done the same last year with SSA when they expected the game to fail.

"i agree this game sucks *****
review got paied"


"Wtf? this game sucks
not even close as good than spyro 3"


"proof that its most hated game ever
new dislike record for game trailer smilie"


"Lol over 3000 dislikes for this game!
Proves that it sucks!"
---
"Soon all of Skylands will tremble at the awesome might of Malefor, the Undead Dragon King!"
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 01:15:06 30/10/2012 by Aura24
HIR Diamond Sparx Gems: 9034
#26 Posted: 01:34:34 30/10/2012
I'm sure the game will sell great. And it's not a bad game. But it's nothing ground-breaking and I'd say the first one was better in all aspects except maybe the graphics and the music. Which are really not enough to make a great game. So I'd say it's okay.
---
Congrats! You wasted five seconds reading this.
isaac343018s Emerald Sparx Gems: 4478
#27 Posted: 01:45:29 30/10/2012
Quote: Aura24
^Skylanders haters had done the same last year with SSA when they expected the game to fail.

"i agree this game sucks *****
review got paied"


"Wtf? this game sucks
not even close as good than spyro 3"


"proof that its most hated game ever
new dislike record for game trailer smilie"


"Lol over 3000 dislikes for this game!
Proves that it sucks!"


Good examples Aura... I really find that last one REALLY funny for some reason
Aura24 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6561
#28 Posted: 01:50:31 30/10/2012
One of the haters actually posted that on the comments of a SSA review.
---
"Soon all of Skylands will tremble at the awesome might of Malefor, the Undead Dragon King!"
isaac343018s Emerald Sparx Gems: 4478
#29 Posted: 01:52:03 30/10/2012
Hahaha! I'd find it funny if there were more comments like that!
WUMBOSIMPSON Yellow Sparx Gems: 1424
#30 Posted: 02:52:03 30/10/2012
When my friends were showing us all the characters for the first time, this was my reaction.

"Aw cool!, most of these are awesome!"
and then
"What the- is that Spyro? What's Spyro doing in this? Is this a Spyro game or something?"
they told me no, and I had no idea why he was in it. I still liked the idea though.
---
cry baby, I am
riverhippo Yellow Sparx Gems: 1049
#31 Posted: 03:28:44 30/10/2012
personally, I think Giants is a fun game. Its better than S:SA for sure, improves in so many areas. At Skylanders, though a bit of a wallet buster, is making new ground in what most would consider a dead game genre.
Slivers Yellow Sparx Gems: 1387
#32 Posted: 03:43:58 30/10/2012
Quote: Aura24
^Skylanders haters had done the same last year with SSA when they expected the game to fail.

"i agree this game sucks *****
review got paied"


"Wtf? this game sucks
not even close as good than spyro 3"


"proof that its most hated game ever
new dislike record for game trailer smilie"


"Lol over 3000 dislikes for this game!
Proves that it sucks!"


Aura24 I think this is the first time I completely agree with you smilie

Well remembered and well stated!
Page 1 of 1

Please login or register a forum account to post a message.

Username Password Remember Me