Having something of a question and a dissenting opinion to the popular negative one means I'm the one who should leave. Indeed. How mature of you.
Wow. I was going to give you some credibility before that unnecessarily nasty last line destroyed your argument. I wasn't even phrasing anything rudely in my original comment, just making an observation. Even if you are right, there's no need to be rude about it and being so rude has invalidated what you've said. Just because we aren't talking face to face doesn't mean it's okay to be so outrageously discourteous.
It's possible that there's a limit to what can be modified in the old toys. There's also incentivisation to consider: if people are going to rebuy some of the characters they already have, why not give them some extra reasons in-game to make that purchase?*
Entitled fans are never pleased. First there was mass whining that there was nothing extra about the new toys beyond their models.** Now all the whining is about the old toys not having the upgrades of the new toys.
*Yes, you should all be glad that you're going to have to spend more money on figures again. I assumed the idea of remodels was to keep the original characters in circulation so you could still buy them for the first game when they discontinued the Series 1 models - in fact because I thought this I was planning to buy some of the characters I didn't already own. Of course, I'm fully aware as to why Activision would want to do it, but there's already an intensive for people to buy the remodeled versions without this new addition.
**There wasn't 'mass whining' when people thought they didn't do anything extra, most people just thought the same that I did (to buy remodels of characters they don't yet own). I haven't seen one person who complained that the remodels didn't offer anything new.