darkSpyro

^
It is? I was implying that people should quit demanding new games and annoying the creators to make some new ones when they should just play the ones they have. I wasn't saying anything like they shouldn't be able to give negative opinions.

Quote: StevemacQ

Why are you guys allows implying I'm causing some sort of flame war when I simply pointed out that an Insomniac Spyro website is still up despite the fact Spyro now belongs to Activision so therefore the former would be taken down.

You all gained up on me in my sleep especially CAViar Shepard and on a Classic Spryo message board instead of the Skylanders one.

For shame! =_=

That's pretty stupid, because the older games didn't belong to Activision, so why the hell would it be taken down?
And I'll tell you what everyone tells me: "Too **cking bad. That's life, kid."

@CAV
Well, if Activision is just out for money as you said, then I can understand why'd they milk it for money, although as long as they're still making good games (in terms of gameplay and such), than it's okay, right?
Although I remember what you said, MW3 isn't getting as much hype so far...

If Activision doesn't own rights to the older then what IF Sony suddenly decided to advertise the PS1 Spyro games on PS Store on television at the same time Skylanders is released as in Sony trying to out-stage Activision's Skylanders with the older titles?

I know it's not very realistic because Sony would be too busy but what do you think will happen next in terms of a business and legal stand point as Activision holding the rights to the name of Spyro?

Or even better yet, how about everyone stop yapping about Activision and Skylanders in a Spyro 1 message board and we all take this discussion back to the Skylanders one?

Quote: StevemacQ

If Activision doesn't own rights to the older then what IF Sony suddenly decided to advertise the PS1 Spyro games on PS Store on television at the same time Skylanders is released as in Sony trying to out-stage Activision's Skylanders with the older titles?

I know it's not very realistic because Sony would be too busy but what do you think will happen next in terms of a business and legal stand point as Activision holding the rights to the name of Spyro?

Or even better yet, how about everyone stop yapping about Activision and Skylanders in a Spyro 1 message board and we all take this discussion back to the Skylanders one?

Why would Sony advertise that on TV?

Nothing will happen, since they aren't concerned. Besides, Sony doesn't own old Spyro. They own the PS1, which would include the games that appeared on it. Activision wouldn't be able to do anything.

^
It is? I was implying that people should quit demanding new games and annoying the creators to make some new ones when they should just play the ones they have. I wasn't saying anything like they shouldn't be able to give negative opinions.

Quote: StevemacQ

Why are you guys allows implying I'm causing some sort of flame war when I simply pointed out that an Insomniac Spyro website is still up despite the fact Spyro now belongs to Activision so therefore the former would be taken down.

You all gained up on me in my sleep especially CAViar Shepard and on a Classic Spryo message board instead of the Skylanders one.

For shame! =_=

That's pretty stupid, because the older games didn't belong to Activision, so why the hell would it be taken down?
And I'll tell you what everyone tells me: "Too **cking bad. That's life, kid."

@CAV
Well, if Activision is just out for money as you said, then I can understand why'd they milk it for money, although as long as they're still making good games (in terms of gameplay and such), than it's okay, right?
Although I remember what you said, MW3 isn't getting as much hype so far...

Me too, I always play them.
I haven't been demanding the creators to make new ones of them, though, which was my point in the last post.