darkSpyro

Yes!!! In My Opinion The 1st 3 games were the best

They're not gonna. So no.

No. They moved on to the Ratchet and Clank series and the Resistance series. Also, only Universal owned Spyro and Insomniac said that they won't be making anymore Spyro games. :/

They don't want to make another Spyro the Dragon. We're not going to force them to do so..

Bit of a silly question to ask.

Yes but they're not going to...

As nice as it would be... It'd only be on PS3. D: And they just won't anyway.

They won't do it.

They cant...They stopped making those games, and if they decided to, the graphics and voices would be a whole lot different. Remember, those games were made in 1997-1999.

Sure. Maybe a fourth one.

Nah. and isnomniac could't think of a plot for fourth spyro game or what spyro could do. Ted Price said it himself.

Quote: spyrocrash

Nah. and isnomniac could't think of a plot for fourth spyro game or what spyro could do. Ted Price said it himself.

^This.

Quote: Lila-the-dragon

They cant...They stopped making those games, and if they decided to, the graphics and voices would be a whole lot different. Remember, those games were made in 1997-1999.

You mean 1998-2000.

Quote: Cynder985

Quote: spyrocrash

Nah. and isnomniac could't think of a plot for fourth spyro game or what spyro could do. Ted Price said it himself.

^This.

Makes me wonder how they keep on thinking new stories for Ratchet then.

I love Insomniac; they don't do it for the sales, they do it for the story- the joy they bring to the player.

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Cynder985

Quote: spyrocrash

Nah. and isnomniac could't think of a plot for fourth spyro game or what spyro could do. Ted Price said it himself.

^This.

Makes me wonder how they keep on thinking new stories for Ratchet then.

Spyro couldn't hold a gun, so they couldn't think of anymore plots for a fourth Spyro.

Quote: Aura24

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Cynder985

^This.

Makes me wonder how they keep on thinking new stories for Ratchet then.

Spyro couldn't hold a gun, so they couldn't think of anymore plots for a fourth Spyro.

That sounds like a ridiculous excuse, but there you go.

They were thinking about having a Spyro game with Spyro using a gun, but they knew it wouldn't work out.

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Aura24

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Makes me wonder how they keep on thinking new stories for Ratchet then.

Spyro couldn't hold a gun, so they couldn't think of anymore plots for a fourth Spyro.

That sounds like a ridiculous excuse, but there you go.

Exactly. That is really stupid of Insomaniac to get rid of Spyro just because he's a non-violent character.

Quote: Fireball

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Aura24

Spyro couldn't hold a gun, so they couldn't think of anymore plots for a fourth Spyro.

That sounds like a ridiculous excuse, but there you go.

Exactly. That is really stupid of Insomaniac to get rid of Spyro just because he's a non-violent character.

Insomniac didn't have a choice anyway.

Some things to consider before saying how nice it would be or not; are the conditions with Spyro's original company still suitable for him? Does Insomniac have enough the same ideas about what makes a good game as they did in the 90's to consider this a viable option? Do they even still have enough of the game desighners who worked on the first three Spyro games left to make another game with all of the characters we know and love so much? It's been ten years and no one can deny that the companhy has changed.

Alas, even if all of the answers were yes, it still wouldn't make a difference because they no longer have the rights to Spyro, Activision does.

It would have been nice if it were possible though.

Yes! To bad there not going to...

Should they? HECK YES.

Will they? Heck no. For shame on that one, Insomniac. ]:-[
(Then again I would probably not like it as much unless SC did the tunes.)

I think they could if they wanted to.
But they said they won't
Does not mean that they won't in the future.
And if they do that will be awesome but i don't really think they would.

Whatever I don't mind, I don't think they will but if they did I WOULD DEFINITELY BUY IT!!!

Of course it should! Even if it won't :/

As much as I hate to admit it, they shouldn't. It could never be as good as the classics.

Quote: Zpyro

As much as I hate to admit it, they shouldn't. It could never be as good as the classics.

Unless Insomniac Games were to re-develop the first three, with better graphics, and maybe an improved story, I think it would be even better.

I would LOVE them to make another classic style game @_@...

but its really unlikely to happen,since Activision owns the IP now etc...

and maybe Activision could give High Impact Games to make a Spyro game..since the founders of that company are former Insomniac employees who I think worked on some classics :3

I don't understand why High Impact Games never had the chance to develop a Spyro game, instead of Universal choosing random developers, they should have at least chose a developer that had some knowledge about it.

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

I don't understand why High Impact Games never had the chance to develop a Spyro game, instead of Universal choosing random developers, they should have at least chose a developer that had some knowledge about it.

well I'm not sure how long has High Impact Games been around tbh :0

Quote: Kimbia28

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

I don't understand why High Impact Games never had the chance to develop a Spyro game, instead of Universal choosing random developers, they should have at least chose a developer that had some knowledge about it.

well I'm not sure how long has High Impact Games been around tbh :0

Since 2003, and developed a Ratchet game in 2007.

They done Ratchet and Clank: Size Matters in 2007, then Secret Agent Clank in 2008 and finally Jak and Daxter: The Lost Frontier in 2009.

i wish they could make another game but i dont think they will plus i wouldnt force anyone

Insomniac's core principles are gun-based games (Resistance, Ratchet & Clank, Overstrike) with incredibly wacky weapons. Spyro doesn't have hands, hence no guns or weapons. Hence, Insomniac moved on. <.<;

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Lila-the-dragon

They cant...They stopped making those games, and if they decided to, the graphics and voices would be a whole lot different. Remember, those games were made in 1997-1999.

You mean 1998-2000.

Yeah.

Quote: Lila-the-dragon

Quote: SuperSpyroFan

Quote: Lila-the-dragon

They cant...They stopped making those games, and if they decided to, the graphics and voices would be a whole lot different. Remember, those games were made in 1997-1999.

You mean 1998-2000.

Yeah.

How come you typed 1997-1999? You got confused with another game series or something?

Sure it would be nice, but at this point, its not the genre they're used to making so who knows how it will turn out to be.

One more would be nice, but no.

Really i think no, the glory days of Spyro and Insomniac are over, heck even Mario is getting boring as hell and sonic is awful

Quote: HIR

Insomniac's core principles are gun-based games (Resistance, Ratchet & Clank, Overstrike) with incredibly wacky weapons. Spyro doesn't have hands, hence no guns or weapons. Hence, Insomniac moved on. <.<;

Well put, Insomniac went on to make much more violent and action-based games. I find it very difficult to change back to much more lighter games after a violent game.

Quote: Jackson117

Really i think no, the glory days of Spyro and Insomniac are over, heck even Mario is getting boring as hell and sonic is awful

I wouldn't say that. Thats the kind of Comment I expect from a Gamer who hates everything recent and prefers older games.
Insomniac and Spyro are certianly not over. Insomniac has been working on games like Resistance and Ratchet and Clank, recently. They are still around. Spyro has made several games since Insomniac gave up on him.
Many Mario games recently have recieved good reviews, and the same for Sonic. As a matter of fact, Sonic has been in a cycle of positive reception since Sega All Stars and Colours.

Errrr no definitely not

if they could that would be great, but since they can't don't get your hopes up for the chance of being one. So just sit down in front of a hardcore 1990's T.V. with your PS1 and enjoy the first three.

I wish!

Quote: Spyrof4n

if they could that would be great, but since they can't don't get your hopes up for the chance of being one. So just sit down in front of a hardcore 1990's T.V. with your PS1 and enjoy the first three.

Those were the days.

They don't. They've done Ratchet & Clank to death now. They should give THAT franchise a rest and Resistance is so bland. Too many guns in games nowadays. Can't Insomniac Games at least make a spiritual successor to Spyro. Fantasy-based platforming like the Spyro game but with more depth in terms of gameplay and a complex storyline. They could even have a human protagonist.

Yeah and they've used the concept of guns to death. The Ratchet and Clank series lost my appeal even since Gladiator and the Resistance franchise is bland and their new multiformat game with EA already sucks because it uses guns.... again!

Why can't we have something more fantasy based? The idea of shooting enemies with guns in games are so overused in games that someone from Insomniac Games will lose his mind over the use of programing guns over and over and over and over-you get the idea.

Quote: StevemacQ

Yeah and they've used the concept of guns to death. The Ratchet and Clank series lost my appeal even since Gladiator and the Resistance franchise is bland and their new multiformat game with EA already sucks because it uses guns.... again!

Why can't we have something more fantasy based? The idea of shooting enemies with guns in games are so overused in games that someone from Insomniac Games will lose his mind over the use of programing guns over and over and over and over-you get the idea.

I understand completly what you mean.

Quote: StevemacQ

Can't Insomniac Games at least make a spiritual successor to Spyro.

They don't want to.

Quote: StevemacQ

their new multiformat game with EA already sucks because it uses guns.... again!

A game sucks just because it has guns in it.

That logic makes perfect sense.

Maybe Activision will hire High Impact Games or Insomniac North Carolina. *brick'd* x.x;