

I found an interesting article on Gamespot the other day which I thought you guys may be interested in:
http://au.gamespot.com/news/2621489.html
Basically, the article seems to suggest that ETD was to get a PC release, but obviously it never got one. This suddenly made me wonder "why were the Spyro games never on PCs?"
I mean, at the time PCs had a large number of advantages over console games, such as
>Downloadable Bugfix Patches (this may have been able to save ETD's backside at the time, as many people criticized it for the bugs that it shipped with)
>Modability
>Ability to extend graphics beyond what consoles are capable of rendering.
Also, besides the standard benefits that the software makers would have received, the games could also be sold through online distribution services such as Direct2Drive and Steam, which would allow for an unlimited continuous amount of copies of the games to be sold, bringing in an endless cashflow for the developers. Just to illustrate my point, I never played any of the legends series, but if I wanted to buy any games older than DOTD, I would probably not be able to buy any of the Legends on PS2 older than DOTD, because the PS2 versions are no longer made and you can only get preowned copies now (which I might add are very difficult to find).
One could say that the Spyro games weren't really designed for PCs, but I know that some of the Rayman games (being similar to Spyro games in that they are both platformers aimed at a family audience) were released on PCs and they seem to be doing okay.
I hope I don't seem like I got too agitated, but it just seems silly to me that PC ports were never made of the Spyro games, as the games have been released on virtually ever other console (especially with Legends.)
Does anyone else think the games should have had PC counterparts, or am I alone in my opinion.