Forum

Poll

Favourite Year of the Dragon boss?
View Results
First | Previous | Page 45 of 47 | Next | Last
1 2 3 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Unpopular Opinions [STICKY]
Metallo Emerald Sparx Gems: 4614
#2201 Posted: 21:41:16 10/12/2018
Venom is not a "fun mess." It's just a mess. End of story.
ThunderEgg Blue Sparx Gems: 549
#2202 Posted: 21:53:28 10/12/2018
At least Venom himself has a cool design smilie
---
I AM ETERNAL!
alicecarp Prismatic Sparx Gems: 10019
#2203 Posted: 15:48:20 12/12/2018
Remakes and reboots do not ruin the originals or your childhood/nostalgia. People say that as if the originals or their memories of the originals are replaced or lost forever.
---
#SobbleSquad
ThunderEgg Blue Sparx Gems: 549
#2204 Posted: 17:49:38 12/12/2018
Education should be about what you're passionate about, not about the money.
---
I AM ETERNAL!
Metallo Emerald Sparx Gems: 4614
#2205 Posted: 23:48:25 13/12/2018
"It's too political" or "They shoved politics/social commentary into it" is not a valid criticism for a work of entertainment.

When people say that, what they really mean is "I disagree with the viewpoint expressed in this work." They just don't have the spine to say it.
Bifrost Platinum Sparx Gems: 6559
#2206 Posted: 01:11:19 14/12/2018
Quote: Metallo
"It's too political" or "They shoved politics/social commentary into it" is not a valid criticism for a work of entertainment.

When people say that, what they really mean is "I disagree with the viewpoint expressed in this work." They just don't have the spine to say it.


UNLESS it's a case where the content literally goes into a screeching halt to talk about some politics issue, also known as a Very Special Episode when it's a show. But we just call that by several other terms that are much more specific, like the writers using the show as their soapbox.

Otherwise yeah, having sociopolitical issues =/= bad. Using them in a plot that's not about those issues... Maybe rethink the presentation.
---
I do art!
IF YOU HAVE TO ASK, IT'S TOO LATE
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 01:12:07 14/12/2018 by Bifrost
whirlwind fan Emerald Sparx Gems: 4509
#2207 Posted: 06:42:39 14/12/2018
Quote: Metallo
"It's too political" or "They shoved politics/social commentary into it" is not a valid criticism for a work of entertainment.

When people say that, what they really mean is "I disagree with the viewpoint expressed in this work." They just don't have the spine to say it.


i'm only going to apply this to YouTube rewind, because otherwise, i do agree with political commentary (not propaganda) incorporated into entertainment.

the second part of your post is a pretty hasty generalization. i agree with their ideology on representing minorities, it's just that the message they were sending felt "off" for such a corporate event. more pandering than advocation.

also i understand that the political message was of acceptance and inclusion so it's not like they're shoving extremist viewpoints down our throats. my previous post was a little vague and out of impulse, so this explains it more meticulously.
King-Pen Krazy Yellow Sparx Gems: 1895
#2208 Posted: 13:54:09 14/12/2018
Quote: Metallo
"It's too political" or "They shoved politics/social commentary into it" is not a valid criticism for a work of entertainment.

When people say that, what they really mean is "I disagree with the viewpoint expressed in this work." They just don't have the spine to say it.



Yeah that makes sense


No I'm not being sarcastic that's a good point

-------

I honestly feel kinda alone when it comes to The Lego Movie 2, I feel kinda alone in wanting to see it
---
Rise and Shine Ursine
Sesshomaru75 Platinum Sparx Gems: 5818
#2209 Posted: 17:36:32 14/12/2018
Quote: King-Pen Krazy
I honestly feel kinda alone when it comes to The Lego Movie 2, I feel kinda alone in wanting to see it


You're not alone, as I want to see it too. smilie
---
Killing slow is the way I conquer
Until you know the meaning of suffer
Project_Unnamed Platinum Sparx Gems: 6751
#2210 Posted: 23:16:15 15/12/2018
If it was up to me official music videos in YouTube wouldn't count as views. And I think this way because vast majority just put them on as a background music and do not watch the video itself hence destroying the basic idea of the video existing in the first place.
---
I might give you more opinions... for a small fee of course.
parisruelz12 Hunter Gems: 6975
#2211 Posted: 07:20:38 16/12/2018
Quote: Project_Unnamed
If it was up to me official music videos in YouTube wouldn't count as views. And I think this way because vast majority just put them on as a background music and do not watch the video itself hence destroying the basic idea of the video existing in the first place.



some people do really watch the music videos though...
---
looks like ive got some things to do...in hd
Project_Unnamed Platinum Sparx Gems: 6751
#2212 Posted: 01:51:35 19/12/2018
Quote: parisruelz12
Quote: Project_Unnamed
If it was up to me official music videos in YouTube wouldn't count as views. And I think this way because vast majority just put them on as a background music and do not watch the video itself hence destroying the basic idea of the video existing in the first place.



some people do really watch the music videos though...


Of course I understad that there are people who like to watch them. But are their watching-first contributions statistically interesting enought to claim the price for being authentic views over the people who just put them on for easy listen?
---
I might give you more opinions... for a small fee of course.
parisruelz12 Hunter Gems: 6975
#2213 Posted: 08:53:47 19/12/2018
Quote: Project_Unnamed
Quote: parisruelz12
Quote: Project_Unnamed
If it was up to me official music videos in YouTube wouldn't count as views. And I think this way because vast majority just put them on as a background music and do not watch the video itself hence destroying the basic idea of the video existing in the first place.



some people do really watch the music videos though...


Of course I understad that there are people who like to watch them. But are their watching-first contributions statistically interesting enought to claim the price for being authentic views over the people who just put them on for easy listen?


well..yeah.

i like to put on documentaries or even just random videos while i do my homework. i dont understand how just simply listening to the video shouldn't count for a view? some videos, like asmr, exist simply because people just like to listen to them.

unless i completely understood your point, and that you're trying to say that the official accounts of artists who make the music shouldn't counted as one of the many top channels because their music videos?
---
looks like ive got some things to do...in hd
Samius Hunter Gems: 7936
#2214 Posted: 11:16:41 19/12/2018
Quote: Project_Unnamed
Quote: parisruelz12
Quote: Project_Unnamed
If it was up to me official music videos in YouTube wouldn't count as views. And I think this way because vast majority just put them on as a background music and do not watch the video itself hence destroying the basic idea of the video existing in the first place.



some people do really watch the music videos though...


Of course I understad that there are people who like to watch them. But are their watching-first contributions statistically interesting enought to claim the price for being authentic views over the people who just put them on for easy listen?


So, are you saying they should instead think of a different view-system for music videos to compensate for the change, or simply remove views from them altogether?

It's interesting to think what kind of effects this would actually have, as most people who upload music to Youtube already do it for free. Despite the amount of views they get they can't claim revenue from the videos since the songs are not their intellectual property.
In this sense, only actual artists and the related record companies gain from views monetarily. If they were to be removed, only these legitimate music creators would suffer. It would essentially force them to upload their music for exposure alone, for free, which could lead to many of them simply pulling out.

Furthermore, there's the question of what else falls under this category of "videos that are not actually viewed". There's a massive variety of them, of course, and technically any video could be listened to without viewing it. Hell, at any point in time you could just press play on one of them and walk out of the room. There is absolutely no way of reliably telling which view counts and which don't. So where would you draw the line? Would lecture videos count? How about video game reviews? You couldn't hope to find a consistent solution that pleased everybody.

Of course you could just rename views as "plays" or something, but where's the fun in that?
---
Per aspera ad astra
Project_Unnamed Platinum Sparx Gems: 6751
#2215 Posted: 13:49:07 19/12/2018
Quote: Samius
Quote: Project_Unnamed
Quote: parisruelz12



some people do really watch the music videos though...


Of course I understad that there are people who like to watch them. But are their watching-first contributions statistically interesting enought to claim the price for being authentic views over the people who just put them on for easy listen?


So, are you saying they should instead think of a different view-system for music videos to compensate for the change, or simply remove views from them altogether?

It's interesting to think what kind of effects this would actually have, as most people who upload music to Youtube already do it for free. Despite the amount of views they get they can't claim revenue from the videos since the songs are not their intellectual property.
In this sense, only actual artists and the related record companies gain from views monetarily. If they were to be removed, only these legitimate music creators would suffer. It would essentially force them to upload their music for exposure alone, for free, which could lead to many of them simply pulling out.

Furthermore, there's the question of what else falls under this category of "videos that are not actually viewed". There's a massive variety of them, of course, and technically any video could be listened to without viewing it. Hell, at any point in time you could just press play on one of them and walk out of the room. There is absolutely no way of reliably telling which view counts and which don't. So where would you draw the line? Would lecture videos count? How about video game reviews? You couldn't hope to find a consistent solution that pleased everybody.

Of course you could just rename views as "plays" or something, but where's the fun in that?


I only apply my twisted logic to music videos. I have always felt that publishing most-viewed YouTube video lists and promoting those said lists on media etc. are highly uninteresting since they are basically alternative means to promote official record labels' products rather than actually providing information to public about interesting independent content creators.

It is more about semantics, maybe even poor semantics at best.
---
I might give you more opinions... for a small fee of course.
Metallo Emerald Sparx Gems: 4614
#2216 Posted: 05:02:13 20/12/2018
The Reach does indeed belong to the Forsworn.

Still fun to kill them though.
pankakesparx456 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6929
#2217 Posted: 22:35:14 21/12/2018
I don't understand why when something "plays it safe," that's always seen as a negative. Sometimes playing it safe is exactly what a series or franchise needs in order to get back on track. There's nothing inherently wrong with it.

Probably a bunch of examples but the immediate example I can think of is Megaman 11. I've seen so many people say the game plays it too safe and that it's a problem with the game, without even considering that not only is this the first new Megaman game in a decade but it's one that came out and did exponentially better than the whole Mighty No. 9 fiasco. They weren't going to risk trying to revolutionize or experiment with Megaman for his first outing in like eight years, they had to play it safe. Which is perfectly fine. There's a reason a formula works.
---
Cool cool.
Metallo Emerald Sparx Gems: 4614
#2218 Posted: 05:37:59 29/12/2018
It should be legal to eat horse, dammit.
Carmelita Fox Diamond Sparx Gems: 9625
#2219 Posted: 20:15:35 29/12/2018
mmmmm horse yummey
exefile Yellow Sparx Gems: 1201
#2220 Posted: 11:42:54 31/12/2018
New Years is one of the least exiting things in all of history. The first day of every year is just an ordinary day except people are more exited about something that doesn't matter.

Or I just "don't understand" or something like that.

At least it's not as bad as my birthday and I'm not the center of attention.
---
òøáÙSkß7-Ó´Éû»Ï\¾èÉ} Haha funny letters
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 11:44:09 31/12/2018 by exefile
Chompy-King257 Gold Sparx Gems: 2797
#2221 Posted: 18:13:12 02/01/2019
Quote: Metallo
The Reach does indeed belong to the Forsworn.

Still fun to kill them though.


no it does not

the reach, along with all of tamriel, belongs to sithis
---
sometimes that japanese future funk be hittin tho...
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 20:14:35 02/01/2019 by Chompy-King257
parisruelz12 Hunter Gems: 6975
#2222 Posted: 21:49:01 03/01/2019
i like channels that review animated movies, but i cant stand the ones that clearly have a huge boner for disney. disney is nice and all, but they have done things wrong so many times.

i have loving rebeltaxi more and more actually. i can't believe i used to dislike him. i cant even remember why
---
looks like ive got some things to do...in hd
Bolt Platinum Sparx Gems: 5304
#2223 Posted: 01:36:50 14/01/2019
I don't like rap music at all. :T
---
you don't know me. i break things
I draw stuff.
Vespi Yellow Sparx Gems: 1196
#2224 Posted: 16:37:52 17/01/2019
The Sam Raimi Spider-Man movies are hugely overrated, and the suit from those movies is super gaudy.
---
(◕︿◕✿)
I am Groot. (*I Guardians of the Galaxy 23:48*)
ThunderEgg Blue Sparx Gems: 549
#2225 Posted: 16:52:11 17/01/2019
Books made purely for serialization are not art. Books that are art are made out of passion and not solely for profit.
---
I AM ETERNAL!
FedUpWolf Blue Sparx Gems: 924
#2226 Posted: 21:50:26 26/01/2019
I don't really like Girl Interrupted, just out of my own preference and nothing else though.
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 21:55:05 26/01/2019 by FedUpWolf
HotDogAndZap Emerald Sparx Gems: 3323
#2227 Posted: 05:31:37 27/01/2019
the disney ride stitch's great escape was actually fun and i liked it

it didnt deserve to die the way it did at least
Carmelita Fox Diamond Sparx Gems: 9625
#2228 Posted: 01:23:59 30/01/2019
canada is ugly
parisruelz12 Hunter Gems: 6975
#2229 Posted: 19:38:24 30/01/2019
Quote: Carmelita Fox
canada is ugly



“Sorry, eh” -Canadians apologizing for offending Carmelita
---
looks like ive got some things to do...in hd
TheToyNerd Gold Sparx Gems: 2137
#2230 Posted: 00:12:51 02/02/2019
Animals are, like, just okay...

I'm sorry, I'm not an animal lover! I've had one pet my entire life and she was too old for me to get attached by the time I really could. My favorite characters in fiction have always been humans/humanoid. I get that makes me a very boring person to most people, but I just don't have a strong connection to animals. Not to say that I don't understand. Animals are cute, sometimes. I just am not as attached to them as other people and it makes me feel weird.
Vespi Yellow Sparx Gems: 1196
#2231 Posted: 00:59:25 02/02/2019
There hasn't been a single good Fast and the Furious movie.
---
(◕︿◕✿)
I am Groot. (*I Guardians of the Galaxy 23:48*)
Sesshomaru75 Platinum Sparx Gems: 5818
#2232 Posted: 00:56:13 03/02/2019
Using the word "trap" to describe a character or a person isn't inherently transphobic. (Though using it for the latter can be a bit questionable depending on the context, and whether the other person cares or not)
Using it as an insult towards actual transgendered individuals with the intention of being a bigot is.

And while I'm at it, crossdressing =/= being trans, nor is it inherently transphobic either.

Also, liking a trap (Not a literal transgendered person, mind you) DOES make you gay, so stop hiding in the closet trying to cover up your insecurities and accept that you have a case of The Big Gay™.

Don't even @ me.


I'm not trying to start an argument over this either, just giving my take on all of this as a fellow person from within the community. If I do end up offending someone, I do apologize. ;;
---
Killing slow is the way I conquer
Until you know the meaning of suffer
Edited 3 times - Last edited at 01:58:36 03/02/2019 by Sesshomaru75
HeyitsHotDog Platinum Sparx Gems: 5004
#2233 Posted: 18:52:19 08/02/2019
You can't be a true Pokemon fan, and only like Gen One.
---
When ever you get scared or nervous about something, you gotta do your best to keep on smiling and Go Beyond Plus Ultra!
TheToyNerd Gold Sparx Gems: 2137
#2234 Posted: 21:22:13 08/02/2019
Quote: HeyitsHotDog
You can't be a true Pokemon fan, and only like Gen One.


I disagree. There’s no such thing as a “true fan”
ThunderEgg Blue Sparx Gems: 549
#2235 Posted: 01:57:12 11/02/2019
Quote: TheToyNerd
Quote: HeyitsHotDog
You can't be a true Pokemon fan, and only like Gen One.


I disagree. There’s no such thing as a “true fan”



sooooo truuuueeeeee
---
I AM ETERNAL!
King-Pen Krazy Yellow Sparx Gems: 1895
#2236 Posted: 15:37:37 13/02/2019
Quote: TheToyNerd
Quote: HeyitsHotDog
You can't be a true Pokemon fan, and only like Gen One.


I disagree. There’s no such thing as a “true fan”



I'll rephrase it for him

You can't be a Pokemon fan and only like Gen One
---
Rise and Shine Ursine
HeyitsHotDog Platinum Sparx Gems: 5004
#2237 Posted: 15:59:12 13/02/2019
You can't be a Pokemon fan and only like Gen One.
---
When ever you get scared or nervous about something, you gotta do your best to keep on smiling and Go Beyond Plus Ultra!
TheToyNerd Gold Sparx Gems: 2137
#2238 Posted: 18:57:54 13/02/2019
Quote: HeyitsHotDog
You can't be a Pokemon fan and only like Gen One.



That's really stupid though... Of course they can still be a fan of Pokemon and only like Gen One. That's like me saying you can't call yourself a true Transformers fan if your only experience with the franchise was Beast Wars or something. You're still a fan of that franchise, you just haven't played/liked a lot of the other incarnations.

Gatekeeping is dumb, imo
Bolt Platinum Sparx Gems: 5304
#2239 Posted: 19:08:21 13/02/2019
Yeah nah, I'm not even into Pokemon, but I kinda agree with hihd on this one. Imo if you don't like the rest of Pokemon then you're just a gen one fan, not a Pokemon fan as a whole because you hate the rest of it. How can you be a fan if you hate the majority of it.
---
you don't know me. i break things
I draw stuff.
Buchi Green Sparx Gems: 417
#2240 Posted: 20:54:44 13/02/2019
I consider myself a fan of Disgaea even though I've only played Hour of Darkness and I'm pretty sure it'll take me at least another month to complete just this game. I've played it for over 135 hours so far. Should I stop calling myself a fan of Disgaea?
---
Aspirat primo fortuna labori. Me duce tutus eris. Vox populi, vox dei. Ad meiorem, dei gloriam. Ad infinitum.
PM me weird stuff.
TheToyNerd Gold Sparx Gems: 2137
#2241 Posted: 23:25:52 13/02/2019
Quote: Bolt
Yeah nah, I'm not even into Pokemon, but I kinda agree with hihd on this one. Imo if you don't like the rest of Pokemon then you're just a gen one fan, not a Pokemon fan as a whole because you hate the rest of it. How can you be a fan if you hate the majority of it.


That’s just semantics, though. You’re still a fan of Pokémon the game. The fact that it’s only one game doesn’t change the fact that you’re still a fan of it.

I’m sorry to argue on this so much, but it was just a weird statement that came across as pointless gatekeeping to me
Sesshomaru75 Platinum Sparx Gems: 5818
#2242 Posted: 23:49:08 13/02/2019
I sort of understand the concept of what a "true fan" is, but I think what we're talking about here isn't so much that as it is elitists?
---
Killing slow is the way I conquer
Until you know the meaning of suffer
Edited 1 time - Last edited at 01:22:46 14/02/2019 by Sesshomaru75
HeyitsHotDog Platinum Sparx Gems: 5004
#2243 Posted: 01:25:10 14/02/2019
The **** have I started here?
---
When ever you get scared or nervous about something, you gotta do your best to keep on smiling and Go Beyond Plus Ultra!
Bolt Platinum Sparx Gems: 5304
#2244 Posted: 01:31:09 14/02/2019
damnit hihd next time keep your mouth shut
---
you don't know me. i break things
I draw stuff.
TheToyNerd Gold Sparx Gems: 2137
#2245 Posted: 01:50:57 14/02/2019
I’m sorry for starting trouble. I think I understand what you mean and I’ll stop arguing about it
King-Pen Krazy Yellow Sparx Gems: 1895
#2246 Posted: 16:25:29 14/02/2019
Honestly I feel like I should be getting yelled at here, since I said the phrase first sooooo
---
Rise and Shine Ursine
somePerson Emerald Sparx Gems: 4976
#2247 Posted: 07:25:25 16/02/2019 | Topic Creator
poop smells
Drawdler Gold Sparx Gems: 2746
#2248 Posted: 17:03:38 19/02/2019
Okay, here's one that's been nagging at me for years now. I don't know why it's on my mind tonight, but it is, and I wrote this so I'll post it somewhere.

Saying something is a "nitpick" is most frequently a dismissive argument and the word is grossly overused.

And indeed, all too often I've seen people cry "nitpick" about **** that gets changed and then the same people praise the change. You all know which exact example I'm alluding to here.

Most importantly- something that's unimportant to you could really, subconsciously, be what makes or breaks a media, or elevates it from "good" to "great" (an extremely important distinction, imo)- in fact, I find "great" media is often made up of many good things you won't notice at face value. You come back and find them, you see more details and see more of the decision-making behind the overall look and generally gain more the next go around. Whereas "good" media tends to be fun, maybe even seriously polished or perhaps even detailed, but really not have replay value.
Don't think I need to explain polish but in the instance of such media being detailed, those details might not really mean anything, thus not actually offer anything when you come back. (i.e. the paintings plastered in Colossus' buildings are literally just there so it doesn't look emptier than other worlds, but they don't fit the setting, offer any thoughtful jokes, easter eggs, or meaningful worldbuilding [contrast with Nevin's paintings in Spyro 1].)
Sometimes you also have media that strikes you as "great" but when you notice the details, they're actually kinda questionable or become grating or overdone or were more samey than they seemed or something. That happens. But I digress.

A supposed "nitpick" could also just be important to someone, or even a group, with thought-out and understandable criticism- even if it isn't the majority, and even if it overlaps with personal preference, saying "nitpick" is just dumb; if you think it's a matter of personal preference, make an argument for that, or just tell someone the media might not be for them. Don't cry "nitpick". It only makes the discussion narrow and gives off the impression you aren't willing to really talk with the opposing view.
Also, you're conflating a very personalised opinion with being a "nitpick" then? And they are not the same. Again, it might not be a "nitpick" to the person, and to have a genuine conversation I feel like this is a pretty important distinction. Ya know. To understand their view.

And hey? You know what? If the person isn't an overbearing presence where they post (which is much harder to avoid), and especially if they aren't being a jerk, you can put up with them criticising something even if it is all "nitpicks", or even if they're looking for reasons to hate it (not mutually exclusive with finding excuses to be a jerk/post opinions everywhere to an overbearing point- you can do this without being a jerk, for example if you're stuck in a pessimistic mood, or even keep it or many parts of it to yourself).

It's just an opinion, and I'm not saying don't criticise it because opinions aren't free from that either (I'm doing it here, wowza), but "if you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything" is becoming a more common mentality I feel. And it's not good at all.
I see it as sweeping something you don't like under the rug. But if you agree with some common praise there might not be a point in repeating it. Or you might feel other people have explained it way better than you could've, while criticisms aren't really mentioned or detailed. Or maybe you really do just wholly dislike something, honestly.

And in general, in my experience, most people simply do not want to hear or especially discuss anything negative these days and it's never just allowed out (even in non-attacking ways, or in supposed safe spaces, or for the sake of some other growth/solution). It hurts everyone. Of course, I'm alluding to something extremely personal- maybe more people than I'd expect are better than this, but to my dismay, I truly doubt that. If you know me, I don't think you could blame me there, I've basically been conditioned to expect that garbage.
I could write a lot more about this "anti-negativity" mentality in particular, but I'll stop myself there, because this really isn't a good time for that and it involves a hell of a lot more than video games or manga or whatever.

Yes I'm salty because I've gotten "nitpick" as a reply numerous times, but I've seen it directed all too often at others and in conversations I have no part in/opinion on as well. "Nitpick" is a terrible word. The difference from, say, "triggered"- which could be really useful for someone with trauma like myself, but of course I never use it because it still connotes things I'm not referring to or involved with- is that I think "nitpick" was never a good word in the first place. I've only ever seen it used in this manner, or...
Just to describe dumb silly things that annoy you, but not seriously and that really don't need any discussion. Like how many times I made myself type "nitpick" in quotes here. Let me tell you, I don't even like using that word- and I hate having typed it in quotes, because I feel like I'm just trying to ne mocking- but it's never going to ruin my day typing it out or something and I'll forget this feeling by tomorrow. Anyway, imo, that's the best use for "nitpick", but nowadays I barely see people use it as that and it's all too frequently used to dismiss alternate opinions.

Details matter. You're never going to see people complain about the same kind of praise for small details, or have people say they don't matter, because it's generally a lot more agreeable to be positive and you'd be seen as a jerk for criticising that. But it can still be a jerk move the other way.

by the way most classic rock feels like stripped-down prog to me at this point
i'm sorry, but i can never get into queen, except for killer queen and bites the dust.

you know when people say they loved a song but it got overplayed and they just can't get the same feeling from it ever again? i feel like the entire classic rock genre is overplayed. i really can't feel anything much from it.

bowie is golden though. and so is steely dan (which gravitated towards jazz-rock, but i believe their early albums were classic rock, and the best classic rock i've heard). i believe there are some floyd songs i love that would count as classic rock as well.
i'm kinda bad with genres admittedly, so i probably like more classic rock i haven't realised is classic rock. but when people say it's the best genre i find myself thinking... eeeeehhhhh...
---
Quote: ThefirstNapkin
You'll always be the OG Jojo fan here
pankakesparx456 Platinum Sparx Gems: 6929
#2249 Posted: 14:43:07 25/02/2019
Don't Stop Believing by Journey is a bad song and is horribly overplayed to the absolute max and I'm tired of hearing it
---
Cool cool.
Bifrost Platinum Sparx Gems: 6559
#2250 Posted: 15:08:00 03/03/2019
Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle > Jungle Book 2016.

As much as the Jungle Book isn't bad, wow the sheer rawness of the Andy Serkis movie is so good. Disney was way too safe in that movie and seeing the deaths and the really good grayness of the whole thing was so refreshing compared to songs and unsurprising "make everyone happy" ending.

also Bagheera and Baloo are pretty much a couple in Mowgli and I love it
---
I do art!
IF YOU HAVE TO ASK, IT'S TOO LATE
First | Previous | Page 45 of 47 | Next | Last
1 2 3 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Please login or register a forum account to post a message.

Username Password Remember Me